Thats because you dont study machine intelligence and dont know what AI is

no, not all robots are AI. AI implies it has the capability to learn

robots can be fully preprogrammed and incapable of learning

they're distinct

They are merely not a powerful enough AI to learn

Guderian, I am trying to stop myself from snarkily insulting you, we are talking in laymens terms rn

u are big braining us rn

And programed machine has an "intelligence" how smart, complex, or capable of learning that intelligence is depends on the programming

that's like saying a pulley system can learn algebra

it isn't capable

A pully system cant do anything on its own

and neither can computers

An automated pulley system can

To the extent is programmed complexity allows it

Depends on the computer

Your engine computer does everything on its own

an automated pulley system will make nukes and kill us all

Based on its preprogrammed capabilities

you're tearing this family apart guderian!

If its programmed intelligence is complex enough

Okay, real quick, because it feels like this is still the human labor debate, if we could automate away every single job in existence, should we @Tiberius ?

Not all jobs can be automated but what we can we should be allowed to

I mean, AI can write music and paint artwork, make memes, so, if a robot could do anything a human can do, but better, should we get rid of people in all sectors of the economy?

We should be free to do so

And if we do then we will have to develop a new systen of economics from scratch

shouldn't that be a group consensus thing?

Fuck no

Groups don't get to dictate the actions of individuals in regards to their own businesses

*looks at how every country handles nukes*

*sweats*

fine, i rule all the nukes now and I say we nuke Sweden

There I clarified

because here is the fundamental problem: the automating away of phone operators in place of an automated system is fine because people who are fundamentally low skilled workers can move into other sectors that also require low skill labor

but the legal system does dictate the actions of businesses

if we hit a point in automation in which all low skill laborer work could be replaced with an automated alternative, even into new job sectors, where will these people work

They wont

let's just make hunger games as a response to AI taking low level jobs

if you no work then you go in the pit!

Are you arguing that we should legally prohibit people from using AI in their businesses

That we REQUIRE businesses to use human labor

Sounds like authoritarianism to me