Message from @TheGhostAgent
Discord ID: 653738562017034241
i believe in the democratic society that everyone should have the right to vote, i want universal sufferage if we are playing in the democratic game. but that being said, if we dont play in the democratic game, it would probably be best for only the top of society to be able to have a say in it
Just because you didnt die until age 18 doesnt make you qualified to determine the future of society
Democracy is mob rule, it's immoral
im totally down with expanding sufferage further
makes my job easier
So your proposed alternative systems are if there are no voting?
someone post the quote from plato about the people who are running the ship and democracy
Just gonna hold on to this for later reference
https://gyazo.com/7050ee2f37fca6fd45e2d8726b9e38de
good night
i would have a monarchical system. it is the truestest form of anarcho capitalism as everyone will be the property of someone else
I believe in basic rights and that democracy is the worst system otehr then all the others we have acess to.
an imortal monarch bent on rule of fair laws would be the best.
<:ancap_ball:636787271466483712>
feudalism was anarchocapitalism at its best
led to the enlightenment
best things
I think you are just saying words now.
... I don't think you understand what ancap is if you think feudalism is ancap...
The guy doesn't believe in morality
Obviously he knows nothing about political ideologies
@TheGhostAgent i dont think you have read any of hoppe or any of the anarchocapitalist at george mason, that is private property at its best
as i understand "anarchocapitalism" means there is no law and everything is done by the marked.
the only law is private property which is enforced through threat and violence
that is a natural law
what is mine is what i can deffend
so it's just anarchy.
with a fancy name.
its monarchy
what?
ancap implies 0 form of govt. Feudalism itself IS a form of govt under monarchial rule... again, I don't think you understand wtf ancap is
monarchy was anarchocapitalist
just one person was able to consolidate through force their property
no a monarchy means you have a king, or head ruler at least.
and that their word is law.
yes, anything on my property is mine to do with it as i please
I never said there should be no voting
i set my rules on my property
Dont strawman me ready my actual statement
I think you are mixing up alot of ideologies right now. (brue)
People should have to perform some kind of difficult public service (doesnt have to be military) before they are allowed to vote or hold office to prove that they can put the needs of society over their own wants and agendas
anarchocapitalism allows for monarchy, go read hoppe if you are interested