Message from @Louis
Discord ID: 657106170338607104
i don't see how it wouldn't really, so i wouldn't be worried. that being said, i also wouldn't get complacent either.
I wonder why they didnt censure
Remember about half the country voted against trump and the dems passed impeachment. This hasn't been won yet
It would be easy support
I guess a easy win for support vs a hard win for mike pence is preferable?
Yeah no they want it to fail
Christ, president pence sounds terrifying.
***ZAP THE GAYS AWAY*** <:smugay:593502151758708776>
i don't think many of them put thought intothe prospect of mike pence becoming president
Thats why @Gray__Fox is completely correct
although I *did* hear that pence was 'allegedly' involved in ukrainegate too, which implies that they'd try to impeach him after Trump should he actually get convicted
That's because the average American realizes this doesn't have a chance in hell of passing the Senate.
Which is why it's losing support
@Cobra Commander wow
As a perceived waste of everyone's time.
Thats bold
Yep
They just want to get rid of Trump for 2020 or at least delegitimize him. They don't care about anything else
This is like, as close as you can get to a coup without being a *real* coup
Please, spare me the Russiagate / Ukrainegate narrative. There's eminently more evidence implicating Biden's son in actual acts of corruption than a fucking phone call with Trump casually asking for investigations into possible corruption.
Oh i've talked to people who say the biden stuff was *completely debunked*
Sure it was.
I tried my best to demonstrate how their thought process was retarded, but alas my efforts were in vain
And so I left them retarded
I'll believe it when I see sauce that doesn't list their source as "an unnamed individual"
Or at least have 3 informants
Which isnt a standard anymore
While I'm all about freedom of press, it should be considered journalistic malpractice to spit out an op-ed as factual reporting with "unnamed sources"
I watched a movie recently that had that
And it was a big deal that the person didnt have 3 informants
Ahh the good days
one means no story. two means no story. 3 vetted informants run the story
So not just a random person like today
It had to be vetted
and three different people
@Cobra Commander - If anyone tries to refute Biden's sons implication, just ask if they've bothered to read the Horowitz report
Ask if they have read any report \
i'll keep that in mind should it ever come up
If the roles were reversed Biden would be way more guilty than Trump. Roles as in who was president. Its a shame how focused the country has been on impeachment when there are actual real world problems that need to be dealt with. Its a depressing waste of time