yea the list is uh...

quite extensive

not really, unless there are other pages I didn't click

i like how mentioning that they own the media is also anti-semitism

that one cracks me up

"Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor."

oh you mean like what whites want to do?

Yeah, don't get it twisted, Republicans aren't the defending champions of the first ammendment any more than Democrats

Defining things that can be anti-Semitic doesn't though make these things, expressly illegal to say, just can be defined as anti-Semitism.

There's no reason to think you'll go to prison for saying any of these things xD

Defining racism is also something the governmeant has done, but plenty of racist people walk around saying racist things

except for the fact its explicitly threatened the distribution or revokation of federal funds on those basis

yea every ive been ignoring you because you are giving more low iq takes

as usual

Yes, the government can pick and choose who it wants to give funds to arbitrarily

that's the government tipping its hand on political speech

This isn't a violation of the 1st amendment, you aren't owed free money from the governmeant xD

Like who they choose to give money to is their own choice, these universities can still exist without governmeant grants

That the governmeant is not in favor of something or won't support something is different from not allowing them to exist

yes it is. universities receiving public funds from the gov are public institutions that are using taxes to operate. Therefore the government should not be allowed to revoke this funding based on things that violate amendments, effectively banning BDS demonstrations on campuses otherwise public funds will be rejected... is a violation of the first amendment because the 1st amendment specifically protects us from the government limiting speech

mainly because this has to do with tax money you see

The Governmeant isn't limiting the speech, it's just not providing tax revenue. For the same reason a police officer can be fired for saying antisemetic stuff or racist language, the same is true of choosing who to give money to

public funds from everyone

and its not like the government doesn't have a record of this shit in other areas

People who work for the governmeant can be fired for being racist and whatnot

The same applies to cutting funding to places

You don't have to give these people money

you are equivocating things that are not equal

non-sequiter

except people who directly work for the fed represent them by association

students don't fall under that responsibility

They are essentially equal, this represents the governmeant, any entity it provides funding to, and it shouldn't provide funding to them if they are bad, for the same reason we shouldn't give money to Iran, or any other antisemetic organization

And who the governmeant gives money to represents them by association

no they arent essentially equal

If we started funding random dictatorships that would be a bad thing and reflect poorly on the U.S. right

it makes sense not to give an antisemetic organization money

From the governmeant

or an organization that is outwardsly antisemetic etc.

nah you think you are making sense

but you arent

I am