Message from @everybodydothatdinosaur
Discord ID: 665813010622709761
This isn't a violation of the 1st amendment, you aren't owed free money from the governmeant xD
Like who they choose to give money to is their own choice, these universities can still exist without governmeant grants
That the governmeant is not in favor of something or won't support something is different from not allowing them to exist
yes it is. universities receiving public funds from the gov are public institutions that are using taxes to operate. Therefore the government should not be allowed to revoke this funding based on things that violate amendments, effectively banning BDS demonstrations on campuses otherwise public funds will be rejected... is a violation of the first amendment because the 1st amendment specifically protects us from the government limiting speech
mainly because this has to do with tax money you see
The Governmeant isn't limiting the speech, it's just not providing tax revenue. For the same reason a police officer can be fired for saying antisemetic stuff or racist language, the same is true of choosing who to give money to
public funds from everyone
and its not like the government doesn't have a record of this shit in other areas
People who work for the governmeant can be fired for being racist and whatnot
The same applies to cutting funding to places
You don't have to give these people money
you are equivocating things that are not equal
non-sequiter
except people who directly work for the fed represent them by association
students don't fall under that responsibility
They are essentially equal, this represents the governmeant, any entity it provides funding to, and it shouldn't provide funding to them if they are bad, for the same reason we shouldn't give money to Iran, or any other antisemetic organization
And who the governmeant gives money to represents them by association
no they arent essentially equal
If we started funding random dictatorships that would be a bad thing and reflect poorly on the U.S. right
it makes sense not to give an antisemetic organization money
or an organization that is outwardsly antisemetic etc.
nah you think you are making sense
but you arent
I am
and you are wrong
Nope
yep
The 1st amendment does not give you the right to free money from the governmeant
once again false equivalence
It just means you can say whatever you want to say without legal consequences, not that the governmeant might decide to stop giving you money
I mean they can basically stop funding universities for any reason they like and this is just one of the stated reasons
For all it matters they could cut all funding to all universities
Well first we just disagree that BDS is anti-semitic, and B, the openness of that definition, coupled with the clear motivation of the government to directly intervene on this or any other political speech, is what we're concerned about
every's argument is basically "well dont be antisemitic then"
They're not intervening on their political speech, they can say whatever they want
lol ok retard
An organization is not owed benefits from the governmeant
Outside of life-threatining services
So like, no, they don't have to give them free money
what do you not understand about universities specifically being public institutions