If anyone actually was able to find out who this person was in a legal context, there'd be serious prison time, hooray for loopholes!

It is a serious question of, who's side are the democrats on exactly? Spies that report to the Demcorats directly instead of the police, siding with Iran, calling terrorists "Austere religious scholars"... like wat... when does it become obvious they are on the wrong side

https://twitter.com/70Ceeks/status/1224529121776107520?s=09

Democrats are scared now

They are "quality controling" the votes

sure they are.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/512442433632731137/674102755593551872/k.png

wow, their field is that bad huh?

Am I the ony one consistently shocked Klobuchar is still running?

the old commie and the fake indian are their front runners.

and I know nothing about pete.

neither does anyone else

so an old commie, a fake indian and "some guy" walk into a bar?

https://twitter.com/KyleKulinski/status/1224551537122390021

ayyyyyyy

the best part about about his shit is all the commies sperging out

so cringe

also, Tl;dr, Bloomberg literally bought his way into the debates

yup

the dnc is fucked

commies vs neolibs

@The Roman Emperor YES

some $1m in donations to different DNC recipients over the course of a single day, and suddenly the requirement for individual campaign donations in order to appear gets removed

Let chaos reign

Then from what I hear Tom Perez came out like either that day or the day after and says "We would never change the rules"

And directly after that, DNC staff is like "hey, yeah, lets let superdelegates in on the first ballot"

funny how they say they are all about democry and yet their system is the least democratic.

theyre okay with democracy as long as the vote goes their way

Wonder what DNC's take on Brexit was

bet it is the same as the remainers is, if they even know what Brexit is.

I was just making the direct connection via the context of 'democracy for me, not for thee'

caucus? more like COCKus

nigger scroll up

secular talk totally hilarious joke that nobody's ever said b4

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

he's panicking so much

who

Seculartalk

Tom Perez? You mean that hack that no one wanted put in, who was specifically put in to ward off reform of the DNC? Yeah. Of course he's say they're not changing the rules... no need to change them. They'd just outright ignore them. Remember kids:
https://web.archive.org/web/20170829025932/http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/politics/ct-dnc-fraud-lawsuit-20170828-story.html

```"The party has the freedom of association to decide how it's gonna select its representatives to the convention and to the state party," said Spiva. "Even to define what constitutes evenhandedness and impartiality really would already drag the court well into a political question and a question of how the party runs its own affairs. The party could have favored a candidate. I'll put it that way."

In the corners of the media where the lawsuit was covered most, that answer became infamous - proof that the defeated Democrats did not respect the will of the voters. "The DNC reportedly argued that the organization's neutrality among Democratic campaigns during the primaries was merely a 'political promise,' and therefore it had no legal obligations to remain impartial throughout the process," a reporter for Newsweek wrote.```

I repeat
```The DNC reportedly argued that the organization's neutrality among Democratic campaigns during the primaries was merely a 'political promise,' and therefore it had no legal obligations to remain impartial throughout the process,```

is he? seems just annoyed as usual

check the feed