Message from @Andyrew
Discord ID: 674114841543311446
also, Tl;dr, Bloomberg literally bought his way into the debates
yup
the dnc is fucked
commies vs neolibs
some $1m in donations to different DNC recipients over the course of a single day, and suddenly the requirement for individual campaign donations in order to appear gets removed
Let chaos reign
Then from what I hear Tom Perez came out like either that day or the day after and says "We would never change the rules"
And directly after that, DNC staff is like "hey, yeah, lets let superdelegates in on the first ballot"
funny how they say they are all about democry and yet their system is the least democratic.
theyre okay with democracy as long as the vote goes their way
Wonder what DNC's take on Brexit was
bet it is the same as the remainers is, if they even know what Brexit is.
I was just making the direct connection via the context of 'democracy for me, not for thee'
caucus? more like COCKus
nigger scroll up
secular talk totally hilarious joke that nobody's ever said b4
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
he's panicking so much
who
Tom Perez? You mean that hack that no one wanted put in, who was specifically put in to ward off reform of the DNC? Yeah. Of course he's say they're not changing the rules... no need to change them. They'd just outright ignore them. Remember kids:
https://web.archive.org/web/20170829025932/http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/politics/ct-dnc-fraud-lawsuit-20170828-story.html
```"The party has the freedom of association to decide how it's gonna select its representatives to the convention and to the state party," said Spiva. "Even to define what constitutes evenhandedness and impartiality really would already drag the court well into a political question and a question of how the party runs its own affairs. The party could have favored a candidate. I'll put it that way."
In the corners of the media where the lawsuit was covered most, that answer became infamous - proof that the defeated Democrats did not respect the will of the voters. "The DNC reportedly argued that the organization's neutrality among Democratic campaigns during the primaries was merely a 'political promise,' and therefore it had no legal obligations to remain impartial throughout the process," a reporter for Newsweek wrote.```
I repeat
```The DNC reportedly argued that the organization's neutrality among Democratic campaigns during the primaries was merely a 'political promise,' and therefore it had no legal obligations to remain impartial throughout the process,```
is he? seems just annoyed as usual
check the feed
they know the results are getting rigged
*We can violate our own rules, even though that is part of the membership contract of the party, and get away scott free*
The Iowa caucus is a turning out to be a shitshow, 4 hours since polls opened, 0 presincts reporting.
The vote counts are all fucked up.
its just a huge dumpster fire of a process, i wouldn't be surprised if caucuses are no longer a thing after this bullshit.
"transparent"
They managed to perform so well in three years. Imagine handing healthcare over to the government; how great it would be!
I mean, they're quite transparently sucking bloomberg's cock after that cool mil he gave them, so, not untrue?
The democrats will most likely not reagain power this *decade*, at least.
#OligarchBloomberg
So Trumps most likely gonna get re-elected, who are you guys hoping will run in 2024?
Rand Paul? 🤷
hope he dies
Edgy.