Message from @Jerm70
Discord ID: 674739644142845953
@PurpleToad People learn from mistakes.
Like the left is always "muh hypocrasy"
Sorry I don't believe in internal damnation fanatic.
Dershowitz said he changed his opinion on impeachment. So why can't you provide something consistent to establish Trump's criminal wrong doing.
trumps acquittal is not news... everyone knew the outcome lmao.
Still love to see it
Trump can't be guilty without having criminal conduct and that was never established.
lol who is this guy again?
Oh boy time for margiritas!
So much salt
<:salt:501105964758466586>
why is he purple
If you can impeach for no actual reason, it's not going to go well.
He was running as a teletubbie
Democrat presidents will have to face the vengeance of Republican officials because of this.
@PurpleToad https://www.scribd.com/document/427409665/Ukraine-Call-Transcript#from_embed
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ukraine-president-backs-trump-says-no-pressure-on-biden-probe
Now, here is the actual transcript. Where in here does the president Threaten, let alone even mention aid at all? Or threaten the president in any way?
It just reveals he wants ukraine to send their information on the investigation in to Biden to the state department, which makes sense as Biden confessed to doing what he did, on Camera. Why does the president of ukraine, the supposed victim, not even claim to be a victim, that he didn't even know aid was withheld? Is it not just obvious this whole thing is basically fabricated? If you actually read the transcript, you'll find there's nothing really in there that's an impeachable offense.
He was appealing to far right death squads.
"I'd like you to do us a favor though"
Yes. Foreign aid being used as it is intended.
But more to the point. That's not a good clear link.
You have been watching too many mob movies.
Asking the president of Ukraine to do America a favor is not an impeachable offense. You'd need to prove he threatened aid (which he didn't, and still isn't impeachable), or that he acted improperly or illegally in some way, blackmailed him etc. Just asking for a favor is extremely common.
I don't come away from reading that thinking that he pressured Zelensky to no end as they claim he did
How in the world is that Threatening aid or blackmailing someone to ask for a favor. You would need to prove there was some kind of threat or that he was asking him to do something illegal. Asking for information in to an investigation on Biden to be forwarded to the state department is... well sort of a routine thing
Ukarinian Officials has said they didn't know the aid was held up.
When foreign police do an investigation in to an American, that information is then often forwarded to the U.S. state Department. That's what happened. How is this an impeachable offense?
This is the actual problem.
Why wasn't the main witness called in the House?
The problem is the left just refuses to see logic or truth and demands everyone goes along with their conspiracies. It's like if you just thought about, for even a second, the entire idea would disintegrate on contact with the truth or the slightest bit of logic
it kind of really bothers me how the facts just don't matter to people
Find anywhere in the transcript where he threatans aid, you can't do it. Asking for a favor is not an impeachable offense by itself
They should of asked Zelensky to make a statement.
And it's dubious if witholding aid even is an impeachable offense by itself
dems had lots of evidence that hinted at what had occurred, but obviously they didnt have damning evidence, or there wouldnt be an acquittal. but trump blocked the witnesses that wouldve brought the evidence, there is no reason to block witnesses and evidence unless you're guilty and are hiding it. its all a cover up. but theres no way that either of us are going to convince the other so why dont we just drop it. he was acquitted because republicans fell in line with their king.
ohmaifucking god why didn't they bring these witnesses up in the god damn house hearing if there was super damning evidence lol. And read the transcript, there is no mentioning of aid, which is the crux to the entire thing. There is nothing any witness can say that will undo the simple fact Trump never threataned aid which is the crux of the whole case
The house made its case.