Message from @Gaylien
Discord ID: 674738032309567499
he had a phone call
cause the definition of the word guilty disagrees with your assessment
Imagine taking Trump's joke video seriously
You can't be guilty in a court of law if you didn't commit a crime
@PurpleToad Citation needed.
Using definitions out of the dictionary isn't legal theory
you really need a citation for the definition of guilty?
it takes like 2 secs to google it lmao
Guilty definition, having committed an offense, crime, violation, or wrong, especially against moral or penal law; justly subject to a certain accusation or penalty; culpable:
They tried to say that Parnas would surely give us some dirt, instead he revealed Trumps sentiment about Yovanovitch in 2018, a year before Biden was running. It all seems like it was set in stone well before this phone call
https://twitter.com/SpinDr/status/1225170766909460481 'Bi-Partisan' <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>
Okay what's the crime that he committed.
But didn't Democrats vote against impeachment when they were first deciding on the articles?
Lmao
i refer you to dershowitz's statement in 1998...
lmao
I knew someone was gonna tear something up
@PurpleToad People learn from mistakes.
Like the left is always "muh hypocrasy"
Sorry I don't believe in internal damnation fanatic.
Dershowitz said he changed his opinion on impeachment. So why can't you provide something consistent to establish Trump's criminal wrong doing.
trumps acquittal is not news... everyone knew the outcome lmao.
Still love to see it
Trump can't be guilty without having criminal conduct and that was never established.
lol who is this guy again?
Oh boy time for margiritas!
So much salt
<:salt:501105964758466586>
why is he purple
If you can impeach for no actual reason, it's not going to go well.
He was running as a teletubbie
Democrat presidents will have to face the vengeance of Republican officials because of this.
@PurpleToad https://www.scribd.com/document/427409665/Ukraine-Call-Transcript#from_embed
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ukraine-president-backs-trump-says-no-pressure-on-biden-probe
Now, here is the actual transcript. Where in here does the president Threaten, let alone even mention aid at all? Or threaten the president in any way?
It just reveals he wants ukraine to send their information on the investigation in to Biden to the state department, which makes sense as Biden confessed to doing what he did, on Camera. Why does the president of ukraine, the supposed victim, not even claim to be a victim, that he didn't even know aid was withheld? Is it not just obvious this whole thing is basically fabricated? If you actually read the transcript, you'll find there's nothing really in there that's an impeachable offense.