Message from @Death in June

Discord ID: 665169406808162312


2020-01-10 12:06:15 UTC  

I thought all the disableds had been literally killed by the Tories already

2020-01-10 12:06:46 UTC  

leg disabled

2020-01-10 12:07:47 UTC  

Nah weren't they cut in half with all the homeless people?

2020-01-10 12:10:47 UTC  

If all the disabled people are removed from any records, then there'll be no unemployed disabled people

2020-01-10 12:17:36 UTC  

libdems seem liberal

2020-01-10 12:19:00 UTC  

apart from wanting a whole unelected authoritarian layer of government over us against our will

2020-01-10 12:19:44 UTC  

it's appointed by an elected body

2020-01-10 12:20:05 UTC  

And ramping up hate speech

2020-01-10 12:20:38 UTC  

not elected by us

2020-01-10 12:20:39 UTC  

i don't think hate speech laws are inherently anti-liberal

2020-01-10 12:20:49 UTC  

<:cuckertarlson:462285973724856320>

2020-01-10 12:20:58 UTC  

Vague ones that imprison ordinary people are

2020-01-10 12:21:07 UTC  

you dont think laws telling people what they can and cant think are anti-authoritarian.... okie...

2020-01-10 12:21:14 UTC  

well it's not think is it

2020-01-10 12:21:20 UTC  

p.much

2020-01-10 12:21:32 UTC  

no it's what you say on a public platform

2020-01-10 12:22:00 UTC  

how many times have they arrested people and put their own context into it... just "assuming what they think"

2020-01-10 12:22:03 UTC  

Incitement is illegal and should be, but everything else should be fine

2020-01-10 12:23:38 UTC  

I see June is making retarded statements again

2020-01-10 12:23:43 UTC  

Libdems Liberal <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

2020-01-10 12:25:44 UTC  

it's about the message it conveys

2020-01-10 12:26:11 UTC  

Lmao

2020-01-10 12:26:34 UTC  

if you accept that certain speech impedes on the liberty of certain groups then i think it's hard to make the case that the suppression of speech is inherently illiberal

2020-01-10 12:28:44 UTC  

Do you think speech has the same effects as action?

2020-01-10 12:28:45 UTC  

the best case against that i suppose would be that it infringes on the notion between the division of the state and civil sphere

2020-01-10 12:29:23 UTC  

but of course even then laws against incitement already do that

2020-01-10 12:29:47 UTC  

i mean speech is an action, but obviously it doesn't have the same effects as a non-speech action

2020-01-10 12:33:20 UTC  

From spec:. "It is time to ditch the Notting Hill assumption that the best thing one can do for northerners is to let them come to London a little bit faster. Far better if HS2 is folded into a project for improving transport links between (and within) cities in the north of England, and other areas crying out for the investment"

2020-01-10 12:33:24 UTC  

This

2020-01-10 12:36:00 UTC  

Even 60 miles north of London there's little East to West

2020-01-10 12:47:52 UTC  

HS2 can carry freight too, but otherwise, yeah that would probably make sense

2020-01-10 12:48:07 UTC  

It's also getting extended farther north

2020-01-10 12:53:23 UTC  

Bring London up north. Let them learn of real England <:hypersmugon:544638648721604608>

2020-01-10 12:53:25 UTC  

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

2020-01-10 13:05:20 UTC  

pot

2020-01-10 13:10:07 UTC  

Need a new great fire of london

2020-01-10 13:18:07 UTC  

@Death in June thats the thing about liberty, its not supposed to be about the groups, its about the individual

2020-01-10 13:19:59 UTC  

when you put the groups above the individual, thats not liberal.. thats anti-liberal

2020-01-10 13:20:58 UTC  

i don't see how that runs counter to protecting individuals from impediments on their liberty because they are targeted by virtue of the group they are a part of

2020-01-10 13:21:32 UTC  

thats what I am saying... protect the individual

2020-01-10 13:22:32 UTC  

yeah that's generally the states purpose of hate speech laws