Conservatives aren't conservative, Labour aren't for labourers, LibDems aren't liberal or supportive of democracy, etc

It's weird how skewed our politics have become

@Mikey ban statistic counting based on race etc maybe

For employeers

That is

Might solve that, not sure of the complete impact, I'm sure theres a down side somewhere

Well, you would need to remove or rewrite the equalities act 2010(or 2011) to get rid off the affirmative action bullshit

I wish someone would

@Hiddenhope I'm physically disabled and that act has made finding work more difficult.

Hah cripple!

Luckily it that visable.

How disabled?

I thought all the disableds had been literally killed by the Tories already

leg disabled

Nah weren't they cut in half with all the homeless people?

If all the disabled people are removed from any records, then there'll be no unemployed disabled people

libdems seem liberal

apart from wanting a whole unelected authoritarian layer of government over us against our will

it's appointed by an elected body

And ramping up hate speech

not elected by us

i don't think hate speech laws are inherently anti-liberal

<:cuckertarlson:462285973724856320>

Vague ones that imprison ordinary people are

you dont think laws telling people what they can and cant think are anti-authoritarian.... okie...

well it's not think is it

p.much

no it's what you say on a public platform

how many times have they arrested people and put their own context into it... just "assuming what they think"

Incitement is illegal and should be, but everything else should be fine

I see June is making retarded statements again

Libdems Liberal <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

it's about the message it conveys

Lmao

if you accept that certain speech impedes on the liberty of certain groups then i think it's hard to make the case that the suppression of speech is inherently illiberal

Do you think speech has the same effects as action?

the best case against that i suppose would be that it infringes on the notion between the division of the state and civil sphere

but of course even then laws against incitement already do that

i mean speech is an action, but obviously it doesn't have the same effects as a non-speech action

From spec:. "It is time to ditch the Notting Hill assumption that the best thing one can do for northerners is to let them come to London a little bit faster. Far better if HS2 is folded into a project for improving transport links between (and within) cities in the north of England, and other areas crying out for the investment"

This