Message from @wacka
Discord ID: 665192972832473099
Murder all the insane people
see... he's not hurting anyone by voicing his opinion
Its not a call to action.... yet.... <:SmugPepe:510408646807519233>
Just a suggestion
are you seriously suggesting it would be the liberal thing to do, to arrest storin now?
aRreSt mE????
<:bootlet:595693013754314752>
that does not sound like a liberal society to me
maybe, though this would be a particularly extreme example
dank got arrested for less
You are going to the camps as well A-rab
<:PepeLaugh:565528391336329216>
it just seems like liberalism enforced on a cultural level to me
cultural memes that interfere with a liberal conception of man are suppressed
thats the issue, you start moving away from the individual and start talking about groups and culture as a whole
Tribalism
Where you do something someone doesn't like and thei tribe gets to rape your daughter as compensation
I seen it in Africa, do you really want it <:SmugPepe:510408646807519233>
but the idea is that these norms lead to a move away from treating people as individuals
if you allow "racism" to propagate then that will lead to a less "individualistic" society
right, but the way you address that is not in a group manner.. its individualistic... and everyone is innocent until proven guilty
and if you're operating off of the presumption that there are no meaningful differences between the races or sexes or whatever then these sorts of things become a lot more problematic in this regard
sure it's individualistic in that you prosecute individuals for contributing to this
i mean don't get me wrong, i can see why liberals who are very focused on state power would see this as anti-liberal
and I would argue, an individual going on a rant about white people is not arrest worthy
https://www.rt.com/uk/477855-whitemoor-prison-officers-attacked/ <:monkaW:587411995616083968>
but from where i'm sitting it almost seems like liberalism manifested in a religious form
not really... there is no faith involved
rather than being focused on the tension between the autonomy of the individual and the power of the state the focus is on maintaining a culture conducive to a liberal conception of man
the only faith needed... is when people are arrested for saying "racist" things... you need to have faith in what their intent was
that goes for any crime where intent is a factor
intent can be proven tho... if say a murder occurs, and they find plans, emails, etc of the murder before it happened
i don't think that's needed to prove intent in a court of law
otherwise i think a lot more homicides would be tried as manslaughter cases
of course you need to prove intent in a murder case
yeah but that level of evidence isn't needed to prove intent
yeah you can prove intent in many ways... thats my point
but you wouldnt just go on faith
you still need "some" evidence
okay
how is that any different for hate speech cases