Message from @š“† š“† š“†

Discord ID: 667071239302545418


2020-01-15 18:20:15 UTC  

If you accept nativism exists

2020-01-15 18:20:22 UTC  

Then you can see the case for Britons

2020-01-15 18:20:26 UTC  

If you view it as only the original settlers are native, it invalidates a load of different things

2020-01-15 18:20:28 UTC  

ah... so if muslims take over england then its ok cos they conquered it

2020-01-15 18:20:37 UTC  

@wacka Yes

2020-01-15 18:20:43 UTC  

Iā€™m actually in agreement with Eccles on this

2020-01-15 18:20:45 UTC  

Might is right

2020-01-15 18:20:51 UTC  

Your argument is that people have to genetically be British to actually be British but that really can't be the case for anyone because no one is 100% pure British

2020-01-15 18:20:58 UTC  

70kA years since an African origin

2020-01-15 18:21:03 UTC  

we're not african... we're pangian

2020-01-15 18:21:04 UTC  

Doesnt = all humans are negros

2020-01-15 18:21:14 UTC  

For instance, the Zulus are not native to South Africa, the Xhosa are, would you say the Zulus are not part of the 'Native' South African culture?

2020-01-15 18:21:15 UTC  

Of course you do, PeP, you only ever disagree with me because your ballsack needs emptying

2020-01-15 18:21:19 UTC  

@The Electric Lizard That is untrue

2020-01-15 18:21:29 UTC  

What is untrue?

2020-01-15 18:21:38 UTC  

That there are no pure british people

2020-01-15 18:21:42 UTC  

There aren't

2020-01-15 18:21:52 UTC  

Thats how genomic companies form stock populations and then compare your genome to

2020-01-15 18:21:53 UTC  

Sun's definitely over the yardarm

2020-01-15 18:22:50 UTC  

No one is 100% British everyone always has links to other places in any of those tests

2020-01-15 18:22:57 UTC  

There's never such thing as '100%', but you can get 90% or above pretty easily

2020-01-15 18:23:09 UTC  

I have seen personally tests which are 100%

2020-01-15 18:23:10 UTC  

But why would 90% matter?

2020-01-15 18:23:15 UTC  

Why not 95%? Why not 85%?

2020-01-15 18:23:17 UTC  

Why not 60%?

2020-01-15 18:23:19 UTC  

lots of people are 100% british... all you need is citizenship and a passport

2020-01-15 18:23:23 UTC  

lol

2020-01-15 18:23:32 UTC  

Magic soil hypothesis

2020-01-15 18:23:46 UTC  

There's a difference between ethnically, culturally and officially British

2020-01-15 18:23:51 UTC  

That's my point, If the argument is that no one can be British without being 100% British in their genome then practically no one is actually British

2020-01-15 18:24:02 UTC  

Only celts and non celts

2020-01-15 18:24:09 UTC  

no one is actually 100% -genetically- British

2020-01-15 18:24:14 UTC  

And we all know which one of those belongs in Britain

2020-01-15 18:24:14 UTC  

the distinction is important

2020-01-15 18:24:26 UTC  

There is, thats how they form the fucking comparisons on those tests šŸ¤£

2020-01-15 18:24:39 UTC  

Again, the 'only the original settlers are the natives' basically uproots 90% of the cultures on the planet

2020-01-15 18:24:46 UTC  

@PureEvilPie Your cousin is a literal negro, you dont have a say on whos british

2020-01-15 18:25:01 UTC  

Yea and Iā€™m still more British than you lmao

2020-01-15 18:25:06 UTC  

@š“† š“† š“†
#9387

2020-01-15 18:25:12 UTC  

I cant tag him

2020-01-15 18:25:12 UTC  

Ye