If the cultural change is limited then they can integrate better

What if there are a whole lot of problems in society and a lot of it is centered around a huge base of an immigrant group. Should still nothing be done? When is it ever enough?

You are saying some French person can integrate better than a Sudanese person?

To an extent

Okay racist

Laws and culture are more similar

How

Sudan was a colony of Britain

@Dᴏᴏғᴜs Dᴏʀᴋᴍᴀɴᴇ We can investigate that group if that becomes a problem

But continuing to let those people to come should still be done, despite that "investigation"?

But we shouldn't point to the actions of a group of people from a particular country and use that as a reason to deny other people who would potentially be better from immigrating from that country

We took over India for instance

That was clearly not supported by the Indians and yet our government did it

Should India now say that all British people are banned from India due to the former actions of some British People?

Or would that be unfair to all the people that have nothing to do with the actions committed

The same relates to this

India should definitely dictate who they want to let in their country or not, yes

Some members of a group might commit crimes

alright dude- Seen Katy Hopkins got yeeted on twitter.... heres some interesting info for you or sargon- Rachel Riley says she met with Centre for Countering Digital Hate and that is what led to Katie having her account vapourised. Well, the guy that owns this Centre for Countering Digital Hate LTD also happens to own Labourlist.org. His name is Morgan James Mcsweeney (also look at the join/resign dates on one of his other businesses). You can find this mans buisiness holding listed on companies house. Surely it is a scandal if someone running a labour news site is using his other company to deplatform right with commentators and journos

But we shouldn't use that as a reason to ban other members of that group from coming in

Some groups commit crimes more than others

can someone pass this message to sargon please: alright dude- Seen Katy Hopkins got yeeted on twitter.... heres some interesting info for you or sargon- Rachel Riley says she met with Centre for Countering Digital Hate and that is what led to Katie having her account vapourised. Well, the guy that owns this Centre for Countering Digital Hate LTD also happens to own Labourlist.org. His name is Morgan James Mcsweeney (also look at the join/resign dates on one of his other businesses). You can find this mans buisiness holding listed on companies house. Surely it is a scandal if someone running a labour news site is using his other company to deplatform right with commentators and journos

@Dᴏᴏғᴜs Dᴏʀᴋᴍᴀɴᴇ Would it be fair and morally right for India to do that?

Yeah

Why?

Since most people had nothing to do with it

Because they are taking precautions to protect their own citizens

So we should judge an entire group based on the actions of a few members of that group?

If a lot of problem has come from that group then yes

So we should judge an entire group based on the actions of a few members of that group? - YES

"Few members" lmao

Well it is a few members

No entire country has immigrated to the UK

Such massive damage those "few" people have been able to do

Okay go to that country and tell me how it is

That's down to our police force

Largely

I agree there as well

For refusing to take action

But why should other people in that nation be refused entry based on the actions of a few that got out of hand partially due to a native police force

That simply does not seem fair to me