Basically that, plus it shouldn't be necessary, as businesses that try subversion rarely end up doing well

If you start selling poison, people will stop buying

And if they keep buying, then it isn't the business that's the core issue, it is a symptom

And getting rid of a symptom doesn't cure the disease, which is likely due to societal changes from other sources

What if a company starts selling products or influencing minds, with a message that is essentially anti-national?

Legality is the quickest way to propagate anything, banning things is a way of limiting use or exposure

If your population is nationalistic (and they should be), it won't sell, if your population is already being subverted, then it might sell

Why not just cut out the middle man and prevent the snake from poisoning the well

Because if you reach the point that you have to ban subversive companies to stop their influence, it is likely the population will vote-in a similarly subversive government

Given the company has survived on it's current path despite being anti-majority essentially

And if that government is voted-in, you don't want them to have the power to ban businesses they don't like

https://twitter.com/HugoGye/status/1224076896645853187

Yes I do want to grant a government that power, as long as they have nationalistic interests

But if a subversive company has survived long enough and is effective enough that you need to ban it, then that company is most likely very popular

Therefore the populace and their preferred government likely won't have nationalistic interests

Popularity doesnt denote worth

People are very malleable in terms of what they desire

Mass media and marketing have been hugely influential; in informing the publics opinion on a number of subjects

But not in one single direction

If the market is fair, then alternatives will be created and potentially be successful

You're naive

https://youtu.be/_dKcCU_T5fw

aka "Asian" man

Those damn Japanese

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/403331745493155840/673646312138473503/IMG_20200202_072726_859.png

Local lad as you can tell from his delightful hue and name

https://twitter.com/The_Write_Type/status/1224025845586702336

<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

What amazing priorities people have

LOL

TOP PRIORITIES

Money > Welfare

https://twitter.com/qikipedia/status/1224090116223913985?s=19

thing above - why evacuate -after- the incident? may aswell let people finish their food

You assume that would be the only event in that area

So how many baftas have joker and 1917 won so far?

it usually is, and theyre safer inside a building than evacuating if there isnt

daily reminder your film has to include non whites to win a bafta

@system11 Well if they are wearing a potential bomb it is pretty important to leave

they already knew it was fake

I still haven't seen 1917 yet ...only the part of the set I was on