Message from @𓆏 𓆏 𓆏

Discord ID: 673647604483227656


2020-02-02 21:36:22 UTC  

We shouldn't have regulation for the sake of having regulation which is what adopting it as an ideological position can cause

2020-02-02 21:37:25 UTC  

Basically that, plus it shouldn't be necessary, as businesses that try subversion rarely end up doing well

2020-02-02 21:37:50 UTC  

If you start selling poison, people will stop buying

2020-02-02 21:38:41 UTC  

And if they keep buying, then it isn't the business that's the core issue, it is a symptom

2020-02-02 21:39:17 UTC  

And getting rid of a symptom doesn't cure the disease, which is likely due to societal changes from other sources

2020-02-02 21:40:15 UTC  

What if a company starts selling products or influencing minds, with a message that is essentially anti-national?

2020-02-02 21:40:47 UTC  

Legality is the quickest way to propagate anything, banning things is a way of limiting use or exposure

2020-02-02 21:41:27 UTC  

If your population is nationalistic (and they should be), it won't sell, if your population is already being subverted, then it might sell

2020-02-02 21:41:50 UTC  

Why not just cut out the middle man and prevent the snake from poisoning the well

2020-02-02 21:43:29 UTC  

Because if you reach the point that you have to ban subversive companies to stop their influence, it is likely the population will vote-in a similarly subversive government

2020-02-02 21:43:59 UTC  

Given the company has survived on it's current path despite being anti-majority essentially

2020-02-02 21:44:43 UTC  

And if that government is voted-in, you don't want them to have the power to ban businesses they don't like

2020-02-02 21:47:35 UTC  

Yes I do want to grant a government that power, as long as they have nationalistic interests

2020-02-02 21:48:51 UTC  

But if a subversive company has survived long enough and is effective enough that you need to ban it, then that company is most likely very popular

2020-02-02 21:49:23 UTC  

Therefore the populace and their preferred government likely won't have nationalistic interests

2020-02-02 21:49:41 UTC  

Popularity doesnt denote worth

2020-02-02 21:50:02 UTC  

People are very malleable in terms of what they desire

2020-02-02 21:50:22 UTC  

Mass media and marketing have been hugely influential; in informing the publics opinion on a number of subjects

2020-02-02 21:54:36 UTC  

But not in one single direction

2020-02-02 21:55:04 UTC  

If the market is fair, then alternatives will be created and potentially be successful

2020-02-02 21:55:17 UTC  

You're naive

2020-02-02 21:55:26 UTC  
2020-02-02 21:55:44 UTC  

aka "Asian" man

2020-02-02 21:56:19 UTC  

Those damn Japanese

2020-02-02 21:59:43 UTC  

Local lad as you can tell from his delightful hue and name

2020-02-02 22:03:58 UTC  

<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

2020-02-02 22:04:18 UTC  

What amazing priorities people have

2020-02-02 22:04:41 UTC  

LOL

2020-02-02 22:04:46 UTC  

TOP PRIORITIES

2020-02-02 22:05:38 UTC  

Money > Welfare

2020-02-02 22:09:29 UTC  

thing above - why evacuate -after- the incident? may aswell let people finish their food

2020-02-02 22:10:03 UTC  

You assume that would be the only event in that area

2020-02-02 22:10:11 UTC  

So how many baftas have joker and 1917 won so far?

2020-02-02 22:10:28 UTC  

it usually is, and theyre safer inside a building than evacuating if there isnt

2020-02-02 22:10:34 UTC  

daily reminder your film has to include non whites to win a bafta

2020-02-02 22:10:44 UTC  

@system11 Well if they are wearing a potential bomb it is pretty important to leave

2020-02-02 22:10:56 UTC  

they already knew it was fake