They are

But you have the right to evict any of them from that business for any reason

so, scenario

As the owner of the business that is your right

it's your first time going to this store, that's just opened, you've heard of. you've had no previous interactions with anyone involved. the moment you set foot in, the shop forces you back out.
assume this logic can apply to monopolistic agencies (for example if youtube or twitter were somehow representable and implementable in this manner) or essentials (life-threatening: inhalers, essential medicine to prevent a death, etc.).

this is justified behaviour by your logic?

Only if they are private businesses

then i rest my case

We can easily have a few nationalised businesses for basic services that can be paid for using taxes

assume that in said example that it could be the only one of it's kind, the only supplier of that thing or it's urgent and this was the most local one

Then i would still have to maintain my belief that it is ultimately up to the business owner to decide if they were going to supply said product

that's not the option in the scenario i described

the scenario i described depicts being instantly removed on entry

is this justified in these circumstances, yes or no

Yes

congratulations on being the first community-appointed anarcho-capitalist. i am going to bed.

The business owner should still maintain their right to evict someone for any reason

The problem is that you are creating a scenario so specific that it is pretty much in the realms of fantasy

The chances of their being a very rare product that is needed for life that only one local store has and you are evicted from that store for no reason are next to none

You could use an equally specific scenario to find flaws in any system

Muh freedom to bum kids

Okay nonce

Stop being gay

I have never advocated that

Thought you were for freedom

Or are you a authoritarian

You don't have the freedom to act against someone else's wishes

Especially if said person is too young to consent

Should people pay tax

And what should the state do to people that don't pay tax

I.e they don't "consent" to the 'societal contract'

People should pay tax on what they earn and if they refuse to then the State should take it forcibly

So people aren't allowed to seperate themselves from the state

Taxation is theft in my view but it is necessary theft for the greater good of society

We can't have a society without taxes

Taxes pay for police to enforce laws

If we don't have laws then people have nothing to prevent them from infringing on others freedom

So it isn't really theft

It's theft it's just necessary theft

What's your take on roads

Public Ownership

What's your take on excluding forigners from voting