Than the Supreme Court

On the law sh

decided. yes. partisanly. i'm glad we agree

?

Is that your level of arrogance

Appeal to Authority.

You know more about law than the Supreme Court?

apparently

Because I doubt you do

they were wrong about it being illegal, their decision was not a result of rigorous debate but rather a preconceived decision

The Supreme Court shouldn't exist in the firstplace.

it wasn't based on law

Anyway, you have all proven my point in why I stopped taking this seriously

Thank you for that 🙂

so how could it be

if the court says something legal is illegal when clearly it's not, then that categorically dictates that i do indeed know more on law than them

Back to work for me now

you're whole argument is just incorrect

now you're the liar

you have no moral authority when you twist reality like that

that's an absurd vision of reality where authority is the one arbiting mechanism of what is right and wrong

@PureEvilPie in australia we have laws limiting speech despite a constitutional guarantee to freedom of speech, the reasoning behind those laws being possible is that the guarantee is not specifically written within some bill of rights but is part of the preamble texts.

the supreme courts decision wasn't based on any law

courts are very often wrong, for political gain

any law of this land, written or unwritten

i'm 1000% sure that pep is an authoritarian

no question nothing

no debate

people say so, so is

well he's a left-leaning voter in the current decade, so yeah hyper authoritarian

well, i work in ecommerce, and i say amazon is bankrupt

so

is

i'm an expert

i disagree; stating that he's left-leaning is disgraceful to what 'left' is supposed to be

to late galaxy

it's over

as maddow said

this is our world now

@GalaxyBrainer doesn't matter what words you use, I'm saying he votes for the parties traditionally considered to be the opposite of traditionalist or individualist desires

yim yum