Message from @Greasy
Discord ID: 676414987174150149
and spinned
Or any of the others
Mate
and you're telling us we're brainwashed
The courts
The people who work in LAW
there was no "coming out"
yes and the police work in arresting people
Decided he UNLAWFULLY prorogued parliament
and they can be wrong
So you know better
Than the Supreme Court
On the law sh
decided. yes. partisanly. i'm glad we agree
?
Is that your level of arrogance
Appeal to Authority.
You know more about law than the Supreme Court?
apparently
Because I doubt you do
they were wrong about it being illegal, their decision was not a result of rigorous debate but rather a preconceived decision
The Supreme Court shouldn't exist in the firstplace.
it wasn't based on law
Anyway, you have all proven my point in why I stopped taking this seriously
Thank you for that 🙂
so how could it be
if the court says something legal is illegal when clearly it's not, then that categorically dictates that i do indeed know more on law than them
Back to work for me now
you're whole argument is just incorrect
now you're the liar
you have no moral authority when you twist reality like that
that's an absurd vision of reality where authority is the one arbiting mechanism of what is right and wrong
@PureEvilPie in australia we have laws limiting speech despite a constitutional guarantee to freedom of speech, the reasoning behind those laws being possible is that the guarantee is not specifically written within some bill of rights but is part of the preamble texts.
the supreme courts decision wasn't based on any law
courts are very often wrong, for political gain
any law of this land, written or unwritten
i'm 1000% sure that pep is an authoritarian
no question nothing
no debate
people say so, so is
well he's a left-leaning voter in the current decade, so yeah hyper authoritarian