Message from @Greasy

Discord ID: 676414987174150149


2020-02-10 13:10:25 UTC  

and spinned

2020-02-10 13:10:28 UTC  

Or any of the others

2020-02-10 13:10:30 UTC  

Mate

2020-02-10 13:10:32 UTC  

and you're telling us we're brainwashed

2020-02-10 13:10:34 UTC  

The courts

2020-02-10 13:10:39 UTC  

The people who work in LAW

2020-02-10 13:10:42 UTC  

there was no "coming out"

2020-02-10 13:10:50 UTC  

yes and the police work in arresting people

2020-02-10 13:10:51 UTC  

Decided he UNLAWFULLY prorogued parliament

2020-02-10 13:10:52 UTC  

and they can be wrong

2020-02-10 13:10:58 UTC  

So you know better

2020-02-10 13:11:02 UTC  

Than the Supreme Court

2020-02-10 13:11:04 UTC  

On the law sh

2020-02-10 13:11:05 UTC  

decided. yes. partisanly. i'm glad we agree

2020-02-10 13:11:06 UTC  

?

2020-02-10 13:11:13 UTC  

Is that your level of arrogance

2020-02-10 13:11:18 UTC  

Appeal to Authority.

2020-02-10 13:11:20 UTC  

You know more about law than the Supreme Court?

2020-02-10 13:11:26 UTC  

apparently

2020-02-10 13:11:27 UTC  

Because I doubt you do

2020-02-10 13:11:40 UTC  

they were wrong about it being illegal, their decision was not a result of rigorous debate but rather a preconceived decision

2020-02-10 13:11:53 UTC  

The Supreme Court shouldn't exist in the firstplace.

2020-02-10 13:11:57 UTC  

it wasn't based on law

2020-02-10 13:11:58 UTC  

Anyway, you have all proven my point in why I stopped taking this seriously

2020-02-10 13:12:02 UTC  

Thank you for that 🙂

2020-02-10 13:12:03 UTC  

so how could it be

2020-02-10 13:12:07 UTC  

if the court says something legal is illegal when clearly it's not, then that categorically dictates that i do indeed know more on law than them

2020-02-10 13:12:10 UTC  

Back to work for me now

2020-02-10 13:12:10 UTC  

you're whole argument is just incorrect

2020-02-10 13:12:13 UTC  

now you're the liar

2020-02-10 13:12:29 UTC  

you have no moral authority when you twist reality like that

2020-02-10 13:13:08 UTC  

that's an absurd vision of reality where authority is the one arbiting mechanism of what is right and wrong

2020-02-10 13:13:20 UTC  

@PureEvilPie in australia we have laws limiting speech despite a constitutional guarantee to freedom of speech, the reasoning behind those laws being possible is that the guarantee is not specifically written within some bill of rights but is part of the preamble texts.

2020-02-10 13:13:22 UTC  

the supreme courts decision wasn't based on any law

2020-02-10 13:13:31 UTC  

courts are very often wrong, for political gain

2020-02-10 13:13:40 UTC  

any law of this land, written or unwritten

2020-02-10 13:13:58 UTC  

i'm 1000% sure that pep is an authoritarian

2020-02-10 13:14:01 UTC  

no question nothing

2020-02-10 13:14:03 UTC  

no debate

2020-02-10 13:14:08 UTC  

people say so, so is

2020-02-10 13:14:20 UTC  

well he's a left-leaning voter in the current decade, so yeah hyper authoritarian