Message from @farrongoth

Discord ID: 679344044773474314


2020-02-18 15:00:24 UTC  

I am arguing from a personal consumer point not an enterprise consumer point of view. Microsoft's business model is an improvement, since going to Windows 10, but that is my personal opinion unfortunately.

2020-02-18 15:00:47 UTC  

yes they can, farrongoth, they can run your hardware id's against their database and see if they're compatible - it would be trivial

2020-02-18 15:01:13 UTC  

it's different

2020-02-18 15:01:20 UTC  

Yeah but they have to have tested that hardware.

2020-02-18 15:01:46 UTC  

it only has to be in their driver db

2020-02-18 15:02:23 UTC  

The compitability checks CPU architecture ram and storage I'm pretty sure it doesn't check hardware at all

2020-02-18 15:03:01 UTC  

it doesn't, but it needs to

2020-02-18 15:03:06 UTC  

it'd solve all the remaining problems

2020-02-18 15:03:21 UTC  

You are right they could if they wanted to. They do to some degree because it installs drivers for most things automatically although you can almost always install better drivers

2020-02-18 15:03:46 UTC  

That's been true since XP tho

2020-02-18 15:04:24 UTC  

difference being service packs for xp didn't remove hardware support and therefore break existing installs

2020-02-18 15:04:49 UTC  

which is my contention with windows 10 🙂

2020-02-18 15:05:10 UTC  

I don't think windows 10 does, tbh but I cba scouring the internet to find out if it is the case

2020-02-18 15:05:47 UTC  

it is the case

2020-02-18 15:07:18 UTC  

Manufacturers tend to provide drivers not microsoft themself I'm pretty sure.

2020-02-18 15:07:53 UTC  

not on legacy hardware they don't

2020-02-18 15:08:14 UTC  

and it wouldn't be much help if the feature update physically cannot install

2020-02-18 15:08:36 UTC  

Okay

2020-02-18 15:10:06 UTC  

like i said, they can fix this by creating a much better compatibility checker tool - one that actually -checks- compatibility of hardware rather than just checking free disk space, cpu speed, and ram size, and then not forcing incompatible feature updates on people that don't work

2020-02-18 15:10:35 UTC  

I agree with the first part.

2020-02-18 15:10:41 UTC  

Pretty sure the second part isn't true

2020-02-18 15:10:45 UTC  

xp was probably the best OS from Windows

2020-02-18 15:11:14 UTC  

That's an easy stance to take

2020-02-18 15:11:15 UTC  

last of the 'small' OS'

2020-02-18 15:11:29 UTC  

wasnt a resorce whore

2020-02-18 15:11:44 UTC  

and Vista came next which made it look epic 😂

2020-02-18 15:11:47 UTC  

It definitely is true 🙂

2020-02-18 15:12:16 UTC  

the RAM jump alone was crippling for a lot of people

2020-02-18 15:12:24 UTC  

Yeah, definitely

2020-02-18 15:13:05 UTC  

7 felt like a move back towards the right direction however was still clunky. luckily hardware had caught up by then

2020-02-18 15:13:17 UTC  

10 is just odd

2020-02-18 15:13:33 UTC  

the rollouts where they just flat out move features like Sound Control

2020-02-18 15:13:38 UTC  

irk me

2020-02-18 15:14:01 UTC  

I do hate the UI changes/reductions

2020-02-18 15:14:13 UTC  

from a work perspective the Snap features of 7%10 were really good

2020-02-18 15:14:43 UTC  

however they could have just updated XP and we'd have all been happy 😂

2020-02-18 15:15:26 UTC  

Might not have been possible they tried keep XP up to with Service Pack but XP ended up bloated by Service Pack 3

2020-02-18 15:15:35 UTC  

fair

2020-02-18 15:15:59 UTC  

although bloated for XP and bloated for vista/7/10 are utterly different things

2020-02-18 15:16:08 UTC  

Typically takes an OS five years to iron the bugs out

2020-02-18 15:16:13 UTC  

Vista was bloated from the get go