https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NGAxppvZ3Lk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAR49HnDo5c

i'm starting to think people aren't using google to search anymore but rather just make statements

Here I was feeling dumb for getting my car hung up in the same mud pit twice

thanks, googlers

Precision Genetic Engineering

>Bob Chipman claiming to represent majority opinion
Sorry, who's side were you on in 2014 again?

Every time I see another new 'big picture' video upload I wonder how the fuck he got his job back after the shit he pulled.

It would work in the scientific sense; but the practical? Good luck enforcing eugenics upon the population.

Unless it has objective benefits.

Even if it has objective benefits.

Dawkins was a queer boi

I support mike Bloomberg

queer=odd

Well it depends

The government is telling you if and with whom you can breed.

That's absolutely true.

No, it would not.

That doesn't seem like too unpopular a policy, at least on this server

>Bobcat
<:poggers:583775485620781087>

long

Dats some pussy...

Dad saw a bobcat punch a dog's face clean off

little shit was asking for it, too

The better question would be, does the sterilization and removal of those with extensive genetic issues in their lineage work within those circumstances?

It would be better for the human race as a whole, but is it morally okay?

or ethically

and, does that fall under Eugenics?

Some people think it doesnt.

If your morals are for bodily-autonomy, then no, it is not moral to have the government dictate when and with whom you breed.

If you we're to impose such biases on to 1500 people, let them breed for generations. The problem wouldn't be the output but the subjectivity of the output. We all have different ideals of what the perfect human is.

To at what point, we can't even impose those correctly.

As we will always have a wrong answer.