Message from @Danacrag
Discord ID: 678665595604041740
Precision Genetic Engineering
>Bob Chipman claiming to represent majority opinion
Sorry, who's side were you on in 2014 again?
Every time I see another new 'big picture' video upload I wonder how the fuck he got his job back after the shit he pulled.
It would work in the scientific sense; but the practical? Good luck enforcing eugenics upon the population.
Unless it has objective benefits.
Even if it has objective benefits.
Dawkins was a queer boi
I support mike Bloomberg
queer=odd
Well it depends
The government is telling you if and with whom you can breed.
That's absolutely true.
No, it would not.
That doesn't seem like too unpopular a policy, at least on this server
>Bobcat
<:poggers:583775485620781087>
long
Dats some pussy...
Dad saw a bobcat punch a dog's face clean off
little shit was asking for it, too
The better question would be, does the sterilization and removal of those with extensive genetic issues in their lineage work within those circumstances?
It would be better for the human race as a whole, but is it morally okay?
or ethically
and, does that fall under Eugenics?
Some people think it doesnt.
If your morals are for bodily-autonomy, then no, it is not moral to have the government dictate when and with whom you breed.
If you we're to impose such biases on to 1500 people, let them breed for generations. The problem wouldn't be the output but the subjectivity of the output. We all have different ideals of what the perfect human is.
To at what point, we can't even impose those correctly.
As we will always have a wrong answer.
I do not seek perfection; I seek liberty, messy and complicated as it is.
Dating is just a democratic eugenics program, change my mind
someone skip to and clip that 1:43:46
Why date
Earth is gonna be a fuckin hive world
Isn't Holy Terra in 40K lore a hive world?