hold on I can make this chat worse

is loli pedophilia?

police are to protect civilians. if they are unable to do so they should be fired or executed to criminal failure to do their important job

depicted, if not enacted

@soldiert01 "unit 731 springs to mind"

No. When fighting monsters, we want to avoid *becoming* monsters ourselves, b/c then others will be justified by our own (initial) principles in fighting *us*

lolicons are pedophiles

change my mind

definitley depicted, yeah

so its the same as watching child porn, but not fucking a child

sorry, raping a child

@excursion12 (redha, richtginger) lolicons are *cartoons,* AFAIK

fucking implies consent

it's still having an attraction to underage aesthetics

Goodnyaght everynyan! Remember to brush your teeth. First day of fasting revealed to be me how much time I fill by snacking, I ended up bored since I wasnt doing anything and I couldn't eat to kill time. Almost every day now I lament that I can't just own an assault rifle.

ergo, pedo

just depends if you're talking about prosecuting a physical action or a mental disorder

using a term for regular sex, in conjunction with a child, is not correct. i dont see how you can be confused with that

Thundermark is a pedo confirmed?

we should be allowed to go to their level @Thundermark because it will show them that we are willing to do so as a warning to others

you thought, but it turns out i identify is a ghanan woman

so you owe me reparations bitch

if you were a pedo would you rape a child knowing that if you do so you will be sent to a lab where you will be exposed to all kind of evil diseases? @Thundermark

just like irl big tiddy =/= anime big tiddy
irl underage aesthetic =/= anime underage aesthetic
the gist of anime is that it *isn't* realistic

@soldiert01 If we stoop to their level, then we have no moral ground to stand on, and it's just a sociopathic power-play of who's the most violent shitbag

@soldiert01 pedos would, yes

an action is met by a equal and opposite reaction

@soldiert01 We don't need to be developing bioweapons for obvious reasons either - one is ravaging the world as we speak b/c chingchongs let it out of the lab

and eye for an eye in a way

alrighty then, where does it stop then. If you're attracted to a 3D model of a child, are you saying you're still not a pedophile?

but should prosecution be limited only to physical action, or be extended to the mere attraction

ok then we could experiment on them in different ways

besides how is it immoral when we are talking about ~~rapists~~ animals

@excursion12 (redha, richtginger) What if it's a hatchling dragonkin who's actually a 6 gorillion year old vampire?

prosecution should be limited to physical action, but it doesn't mean I can't ridicule you online

that would be fucky, definitively. but as long as no real children are harmed, no crime is committed

as far as i'm concerned, you can think whatever you want, but the second you seek out pictures of naked children, therefore encouraging abuse towards them even if you arent the one doing it, or actually are abusing children, then you deserve to be punished

looking at child porn, is as bad as making childporn, because you are encouraging the creation of it by seeking it out

@excursion12 (redha, richtginger) *WON'T SOMEBODY **PLEASE** THINK OF THE PIXELS!* 😱

child porn necessitates harm done to children which = crime