ergo, pedo

just depends if you're talking about prosecuting a physical action or a mental disorder

using a term for regular sex, in conjunction with a child, is not correct. i dont see how you can be confused with that

Thundermark is a pedo confirmed?

we should be allowed to go to their level @Thundermark because it will show them that we are willing to do so as a warning to others

you thought, but it turns out i identify is a ghanan woman

so you owe me reparations bitch

if you were a pedo would you rape a child knowing that if you do so you will be sent to a lab where you will be exposed to all kind of evil diseases? @Thundermark

just like irl big tiddy =/= anime big tiddy
irl underage aesthetic =/= anime underage aesthetic
the gist of anime is that it *isn't* realistic

@soldiert01 If we stoop to their level, then we have no moral ground to stand on, and it's just a sociopathic power-play of who's the most violent shitbag

@soldiert01 pedos would, yes

an action is met by a equal and opposite reaction

@soldiert01 We don't need to be developing bioweapons for obvious reasons either - one is ravaging the world as we speak b/c chingchongs let it out of the lab

and eye for an eye in a way

alrighty then, where does it stop then. If you're attracted to a 3D model of a child, are you saying you're still not a pedophile?

but should prosecution be limited only to physical action, or be extended to the mere attraction

ok then we could experiment on them in different ways

besides how is it immoral when we are talking about ~~rapists~~ animals

@excursion12 (redha, richtginger) What if it's a hatchling dragonkin who's actually a 6 gorillion year old vampire?

prosecution should be limited to physical action, but it doesn't mean I can't ridicule you online

that would be fucky, definitively. but as long as no real children are harmed, no crime is committed

as far as i'm concerned, you can think whatever you want, but the second you seek out pictures of naked children, therefore encouraging abuse towards them even if you arent the one doing it, or actually are abusing children, then you deserve to be punished

looking at child porn, is as bad as making childporn, because you are encouraging the creation of it by seeking it out

@excursion12 (redha, richtginger) *WON'T SOMEBODY **PLEASE** THINK OF THE PIXELS!* 😱

child porn necessitates harm done to children which = crime

stfu pedo

<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

and i;d argue lolicon falls in to that category

sexualizing the image of a child, therefore normalizing sexual attraction to children

which will lead to the previously discussed problem

that's a point, if its an artificially created image on the screen, there's not really a victim

genuine photos are another matter

just because I think you're a pedophile for masturbating to lolis does not mean I think you should be locked up for it. I just think you're a disgusting human being

they both lead to the same outcome though joker

so should be treated the same

@excursion12 (redha, richtginger) "Everyone I don't agree with is a ~~Nazi Alt-Right Russian Troll Bot Jew SJW~~ *pedo.*" A child's guide to arguing on the internet

as long as there's no harm done to children, the only crime possible is thought crime. and that's a road that ends on a nanny state. fricc dat

strawman

I expected better from you