We're kind of bad-ass, also we just didn't have a lot of civilians in Europe obviously

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48813997393_f4dbae9434_o.png

Just did some research

And through the entire war

The most populous city ever bombed

in the persian gulf war, the U.S. lost 292 men vs. 25,000 to 50,000 for iraq. Like we tend to slaughter people

london?

or leningrad

prolly

Only had 2 million deaths, that’s including people who went to water and died

this chink has a nice arse

Nope

Tokyo fire bombing.

stalingrad?

Berlin was the most populous

Also the Russians account for about 20-30 million of the deaths remember

huh

They sent soldiers to the frontlines often times without any weapons to in to a hail of german machine gun fire and artillery fire

@Steyr "Thick" Shotgun you spyin on yer coworkers?

I mean, like half those causaltiesa re from Russia

So if only 2 million out of 4 million died in the most populous place attacked

And then there's starvation, freezing to death, disease spreading, and a whole host of other problems that resulted. It's not all from outright murder

They was also daily bombings and what have you

IT IS MEMECHANNALLL

@everybodydothatdinosaur I’m measuring this entirely by population change

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

There are literally thousands of cities in Europe, people were round up and sent to the frontlines etc.

tbh the destruction of dresden was a war crime

I would wager than maybe 10% of the population change was actually death

Dresden deserved it

and you had people killed all over at the time, it was't just in one place

it didnt