Message from @zero_consequences
Discord ID: 680595191643898044
he keeps strawmanning
desperado
yeah i was referring to the idea fdr's policies killed 7 million people
OHOH NO SKELATON IN MEDIA
Ah, my bad then.
*picture of unsuspecting Ford armed with IRA explosives*
<:powerful:595334910764515338>
🇮🇪
>simpin fer bloomberg
mike 13/60 bloomberg
Rebuked and refuted
the main takeaway from this argument:
>a state-owned source saying they dindu nuffin is right
>some rando literally-who with an article in a state-owned source...who says some other govt did something bad is also right
Hoes mad
the point is that it isn't correct
It's just as correct as Soviet Sources
nope
RT is state-owned, is it not?
<:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586> 🤡
RT (formerly Russia Today) is a Russian international television network funded by the Russian government.
yeah what about it
> Had to find it. @Telly_G 『⚡130』PC |
L.
@Death in June How are the state-owned sources that say that the holodomor didn't happen (as a result of the USSR)....correct?
So what if it's propaganda. What's your point? @SPOOKY Phil, Ruler of Heck
no one is referring to state sources that explicitly say that
but archival data can provide information to the contrary
Archival data that couldn't have possibly been forged or manipulated to fit an agenda?
@Son of Rome That **was** my point that it was propoganda, actually.
@SPOOKY Phil, Ruler of Heck Am lampooning Death in June
it's possible i suppose but i don't see why it would have been manipulated unless the russian federation did so after the fall of the ussr, and even if russia did that it seems odd considering they didn't get rid of a lot of very unflattering things about the ussr
I have no problem with pro American propaganda.
Rather than attack the source of the article, let's get to the meat and merit of the article's point.