That's as ridiculous as something like "anarcho-socialism" lol

It barely even makes sense

anarcho-socialism is the same as anarcho-capitalism

they are both just anarchy

words don't matter as much as concepts

If the dictatorship doesn't do anything than technically yes

and there is no difference between different anarchy

Both retarded and impossible?

I agree

you are placing form over function

you're literally arguing against commonly-held definitions

please use facts instead of feelings, kthx

No

I'm not

ok then

ladies....

dont use facts then

have fun

definitionally correct unrealistic and won't happen

>uses appeal to definition argument
>"please use facts over feelings"

Holy Shit

amazing

The irony

lol ancoms and ancaps disagree on a lot my guy.

I link the definition

namely the NAP

and you ignore it like a retard

The problem with nationalism

Rationalism**

anyways, I'll go to sleep feeling content that I linked evidence and this retard literally has nothing to back up his autism

@Coolitic https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Appeal-to-Definition

You so are here to win lol

Link it again though

Why the fuck would you know what ancoms and ancaps think

the problem is the kids are so rigid in the thinking and so poor in their understanding that you can't label something using any OTHER word to debug the concept without them getting confused

I didn't see and want to read it

@Samaritan™ only because I wanna sleep now

Nvm

I see it

```whose state's only functions are to act as an enforcer of the non-aggression principle by providing its citizens with the military, the police and courts, thereby protecting them from aggression, theft, breach of contract, fraud and enforcing property laws. 19th-century Britain has been described by historian Charles Townshend as a standard-bearer of this form of government among Western countries.```

source? context