Message from @phadreus

Discord ID: 683536243539181644


2020-03-01 04:47:23 UTC  
2020-03-01 04:47:36 UTC  

ineffiency of gov isn't a bug; it's a FEATURE of having 3 branches balance each other

2020-03-01 04:47:42 UTC  

Minarchy is also a system of rulership, one featuring small central government and extremely lax economic regulations

2020-03-01 04:47:43 UTC  

same is true with State's rights

2020-03-01 04:47:50 UTC  

There's still a central power

2020-03-01 04:47:51 UTC  

what's your standard?

2020-03-01 04:47:59 UTC  

It would be a feature if both sides didn't share vested interest

2020-03-01 04:48:00 UTC  

```whose state's only functions are to act as an enforcer of the non-aggression principle by providing its citizens with the military, the police and courts, thereby protecting them from aggression, theft, breach of contract, fraud and enforcing property laws. 19th-century Britain has been described by historian Charles Townshend as a standard-bearer of this form of government among Western countries.```

2020-03-01 04:48:04 UTC  

The globalists

2020-03-01 04:48:08 UTC  

central power has *nothing* to do with minarchism

2020-03-01 04:48:11 UTC  

You cannot have both a minarchist government and an oligarchy

2020-03-01 04:48:13 UTC  

nothing *at all*

2020-03-01 04:48:16 UTC  

yes you can

2020-03-01 04:48:19 UTC  

I suppose the founders couldn;t have accounted for that one

2020-03-01 04:48:20 UTC  

That's Just not a thing

2020-03-01 04:48:21 UTC  

what is more efficent? having each state gov a dept for each function? or centralizing all those functions on the federal level?

2020-03-01 04:48:23 UTC  

you're retarded

2020-03-01 04:48:47 UTC  

the more you hyper-focus on efficency, the more the authority becomes centralized

2020-03-01 04:48:48 UTC  

you can have a minarchist dictatorship

2020-03-01 04:48:59 UTC  

because the decision-making arm is not *at all* defined under minarchism

2020-03-01 04:48:59 UTC  

That's as ridiculous as something like "anarcho-socialism" lol

2020-03-01 04:49:06 UTC  

It barely even makes sense

2020-03-01 04:49:12 UTC  

anarcho-socialism is the same as anarcho-capitalism

2020-03-01 04:49:21 UTC  

they are both just anarchy

2020-03-01 04:49:21 UTC  

words don't matter as much as concepts

2020-03-01 04:49:26 UTC  

If the dictatorship doesn't do anything than technically yes

2020-03-01 04:49:27 UTC  

and there is no difference between different anarchy

2020-03-01 04:49:30 UTC  

Both retarded and impossible?

2020-03-01 04:49:32 UTC  

I agree

2020-03-01 04:49:32 UTC  

you are placing form over function

2020-03-01 04:49:46 UTC  

you're literally arguing against commonly-held definitions

2020-03-01 04:49:53 UTC  

please use facts instead of feelings, kthx

2020-03-01 04:49:55 UTC  

No

2020-03-01 04:49:58 UTC  

I'm not

2020-03-01 04:49:59 UTC  

ok then

2020-03-01 04:50:03 UTC  

ladies....

2020-03-01 04:50:04 UTC  

dont use facts then

2020-03-01 04:50:05 UTC  

have fun

2020-03-01 04:50:25 UTC  

definitionally correct unrealistic and won't happen

2020-03-01 04:50:25 UTC  

>uses appeal to definition argument
>"please use facts over feelings"

2020-03-01 04:50:29 UTC  

Holy Shit