have fun

definitionally correct unrealistic and won't happen

>uses appeal to definition argument
>"please use facts over feelings"

Holy Shit

amazing

The irony

lol ancoms and ancaps disagree on a lot my guy.

I link the definition

namely the NAP

and you ignore it like a retard

The problem with nationalism

Rationalism**

anyways, I'll go to sleep feeling content that I linked evidence and this retard literally has nothing to back up his autism

@Coolitic https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Appeal-to-Definition

You so are here to win lol

Link it again though

Why the fuck would you know what ancoms and ancaps think

the problem is the kids are so rigid in the thinking and so poor in their understanding that you can't label something using any OTHER word to debug the concept without them getting confused

I didn't see and want to read it

@Samaritan™ only because I wanna sleep now

Nvm

I see it

```whose state's only functions are to act as an enforcer of the non-aggression principle by providing its citizens with the military, the police and courts, thereby protecting them from aggression, theft, breach of contract, fraud and enforcing property laws. 19th-century Britain has been described by historian Charles Townshend as a standard-bearer of this form of government among Western countries.```

source? context

ARRRGH

@Coolitic how does that definition contradict anything I've said???

https://tenor.com/tmyW.gif @Coolitic

`19th-century Britain`

nope

not even gonna do this rn

I'm sleeping

Based on that definition authoritarianism and minarchism are mutually exclusive

Very obviously

think coolitic has been sleeping for awhile

unlike him

When did authority become an ism

Anyways, arguing from definition is retarded

Definitionally you can have a non authoritarianism dictatorship

Ancoms want mini nukes while ancaps only want the state to have it.

And I need to walk my dog

authority is always an ism