Message from @phadreus
Discord ID: 683536917685469232
definitionally correct unrealistic and won't happen
>uses appeal to definition argument
>"please use facts over feelings"
Holy Shit
amazing
The irony
lol ancoms and ancaps disagree on a lot my guy.
I link the definition
namely the NAP
and you ignore it like a retard
The problem with nationalism
Rationalism**
anyways, I'll go to sleep feeling content that I linked evidence and this retard literally has nothing to back up his autism
You so are here to win lol
Link it again though
Why the fuck would you know what ancoms and ancaps think
the problem is the kids are so rigid in the thinking and so poor in their understanding that you can't label something using any OTHER word to debug the concept without them getting confused
I didn't see and want to read it
@Samaritan™ only because I wanna sleep now
Nvm
```whose state's only functions are to act as an enforcer of the non-aggression principle by providing its citizens with the military, the police and courts, thereby protecting them from aggression, theft, breach of contract, fraud and enforcing property laws. 19th-century Britain has been described by historian Charles Townshend as a standard-bearer of this form of government among Western countries.```
source? context
ARRRGH
@Coolitic how does that definition contradict anything I've said???
`19th-century Britain`
nope
not even gonna do this rn
I'm sleeping
Based on that definition authoritarianism and minarchism are mutually exclusive
Very obviously
think coolitic has been sleeping for awhile
unlike him
When did authority become an ism
Anyways, arguing from definition is retarded
Definitionally you can have a non authoritarianism dictatorship
Ancoms want mini nukes while ancaps only want the state to have it.
And I need to walk my dog
authority is always an ism
with the weak