Message from @Phobia
Discord ID: 623296733207855123
Sorry about that
however, there's another section that supports it
`Local campaigns have indeed stymied many new construction projects. There is a political dimension to this problem because local politicians are more attentive to the needs of older, retired homeowners, who tend to have time to devote to lobbying, while the younger working people who would benefit do not.`
"not in my back yard"
they're using the state to oppress the poor
🤔
Yh
Issue is with the free market utopia
that's a very subjective word
What is to stop corporate organisations resembling a government imposing restrictions?
Yes I am using it in the playful way to refer to Ancapistan
Yes
but they wouldn't be breaching the NAP
how so?
It could be such that by consentign to necessary service for survival
also, corporations are a construct of the state
the term business would be more accurate
you could agree to the circumstances of the service that expand upon other service
I know this because I *am* a corporation :P
i.e.
If I am going to use a private road I have to pay X 'voluntary rent - not tax I promise but it is kind of' and consent to give away X rights over property
I will then simply not sell my road to any competition that may be more lenient as it provides me a lot of market power
if it's a private road and the owner requires you to pay to use it, then you either pay to use it or use it and violate the NAP
Yes it is compulsion by association
The type of coercion the NAP doesn't address
your argument falls flat on its face, what is the purpose of owning a road
To make profit of those that use the service?
"I'm going to open a really big store, buy a bunch of products to stock it, but shut out the public if they don't pay these ridiculously high prices"
that's not a realistic scenario
Nr
more so I am going to set a nasty but affordable fee