Sorry about that

however, there's another section that supports it

`Local campaigns have indeed stymied many new construction projects. There is a political dimension to this problem because local politicians are more attentive to the needs of older, retired homeowners, who tend to have time to devote to lobbying, while the younger working people who would benefit do not.`

"not in my back yard"

they're using the state to oppress the poor

🤔

Yh

Issue is with the free market utopia

that's a very subjective word

What is to stop corporate organisations resembling a government imposing restrictions?

Yes I am using it in the playful way to refer to Ancapistan

if they did, it would just be a government lol

Yes

but they wouldn't be breaching the NAP

how so?

It could be such that by consentign to necessary service for survival

also, corporations are a construct of the state

the term business would be more accurate

you could agree to the circumstances of the service that expand upon other service

I know this because I *am* a corporation :P

i.e.

If I am going to use a private road I have to pay X 'voluntary rent - not tax I promise but it is kind of' and consent to give away X rights over property

I will then simply not sell my road to any competition that may be more lenient as it provides me a lot of market power

if it's a private road and the owner requires you to pay to use it, then you either pay to use it or use it and violate the NAP

Yes it is compulsion by association