Message from @Anastasia
Discord ID: 630299295903645716
@Anastasia "So many people" - provide evidence are your arguments are invalid. Screenshots are not evidence.
Should I marinate my tendies over night
Nope. Your actions are the evidence. Duh.
Maybe fancy morning tendies will do
When you use Discord's platform you must accept their terms. This is called a contract, you either agree or you are in violation of the contract.
My actions are the evidence? lmfao that's rich
I haven't taken a single action
Nope. It's poor. Poor quality.
@Anastasia there are some legitimate cases for implied consent outside of property allocation
I've typed a bunch of words, that's not action
Implied consent is coercion.
Prove it
Typing is an action, idiot
"This contract that I willingly signed is poor quality so it's invalid"
🤔
And you run around calling other people idiots
Prove that implicit consent is necessarily coercive
Because I didn't give consent. You just assumed it and now you are attempting to enforce a contract that you implied I agreed to.
Clicking the "I accept" box is called consent
there's nothing implicit about it
Sure is.
@Anastasia such is not an argument for implicit consent being coercive
So you don't agree to Discord's ToS?
Simply that it isn’t consent-actual
Ahhh yes Oodkac and tendies
A breakfast of champions
@Phobia @darops of cheese shut tf up
Imposing an involuntary heirarchy over someone (because they didnt consent) is coercive.
You're attempting to get big brained with someone who has a small brain Toast
@unwoundtoast toasty lad
There’s no point
@Anastasia implicit consent does not beget an involuntary hierarchy
Your assumption of their consent is not consent.
Someone who honestly believes that accepting the terms of service in order to access a platform is not consent
It’s a dead end
Still not an argument
It sure is.
Assumptions are not consent, certainly, but that does not make them coercive
Also not an argument
Welp I gotta go to sleep