I've typed a bunch of words, that's not action

Implied consent is coercion.

Prove it

Typing is an action, idiot

"This contract that I willingly signed is poor quality so it's invalid"

🤔

And you run around calling other people idiots

Prove that implicit consent is necessarily coercive

Because I didn't give consent. You just assumed it and now you are attempting to enforce a contract that you implied I agreed to.

Clicking the "I accept" box is called consent

there's nothing implicit about it

How could I give consent to something I didnt agree to?

Sure is.

@Anastasia such is not an argument for implicit consent being coercive

So you don't agree to Discord's ToS?

Simply that it isn’t consent-actual

@Anastasia

Ahhh yes Oodkac and tendies

A breakfast of champions

@Phobia @darops of cheese shut tf up

Imposing an involuntary heirarchy over someone (because they didnt consent) is coercive.

You're attempting to get big brained with someone who has a small brain Toast

@unwoundtoast toasty lad
There’s no point

@Anastasia implicit consent does not beget an involuntary hierarchy

Your assumption of their consent is not consent.

Someone who honestly believes that accepting the terms of service in order to access a platform is not consent

It’s a dead end

Still not an argument

It sure is.

Assumptions are not consent, certainly, but that does not make them coercive

Also not an argument

Welp I gotta go to sleep

Mandatory 5 hours

See y’all

I have seen 0 evidence such that implicit consent is *necessarily* coercive

Prove that I consented. You can't. Also, if you want to get explicit consent, you have to ensure that the user has ACTUALLY consented. I can assure you that when I get invited into a discord server there is NO consent needed.

That’s not my point

You have yet to prove that implicit consent is necessarily coercive

You're here, using their platform. That's proof of consent.

Are you this illiterate?

Prove that I consented