Message from @unwoundtoast
Discord ID: 630300392424734720
@Anastasia implicit consent does not beget an involuntary hierarchy
Your assumption of their consent is not consent.
Someone who honestly believes that accepting the terms of service in order to access a platform is not consent
It’s a dead end
Still not an argument
It sure is.
Assumptions are not consent, certainly, but that does not make them coercive
Also not an argument
Welp I gotta go to sleep
Mandatory 5 hours
See y’all
I have seen 0 evidence such that implicit consent is *necessarily* coercive
Prove that I consented. You can't. Also, if you want to get explicit consent, you have to ensure that the user has ACTUALLY consented. I can assure you that when I get invited into a discord server there is NO consent needed.
That’s not my point
You have yet to prove that implicit consent is necessarily coercive
You're here, using their platform. That's proof of consent.
Are you this illiterate?
Prove that I consented
Prove it
Show me where it says so, other than your assumption.
Mongoloid
Do not allow retards to gain ground
And in order to accomplish such
Shut up
Implicit consent makes the assumption that one agrees. Yet there is no factual evidence that shows that.
@Anastasia are you to address my question or not?
@unwoundtoast
I see. Resorting to insults. And you thought you were e above that.
Prove I thought such
I dare you
@unwoundtoast
That is addressing your question. It's impossible to prove implicit consent factually
Unless, of course, youre a statist.
That’s not relevant to my question. May I state it again?
It's not relevant because you say so, isn't enough.
Quote my challenge then
And show relevancy
I just did.
You just quoted my challenge?
Where?
Fucking sophist
Implied consent is necessarily coercive for the reason I described. It's not tough.