Message from @Anastasia
Discord ID: 630301307785314304
@Phobia this is why you need to shut tf up
Mongoloid
Do not allow retards to gain ground
And in order to accomplish such
Shut up
Implicit consent makes the assumption that one agrees. Yet there is no factual evidence that shows that.
@Anastasia are you to address my question or not?
@unwoundtoast
I see. Resorting to insults. And you thought you were e above that.
Prove I thought such
I dare you
@unwoundtoast
That is addressing your question. It's impossible to prove implicit consent factually
Unless, of course, youre a statist.
That’s not relevant to my question. May I state it again?
It's not relevant because you say so, isn't enough.
Quote my challenge then
And show relevancy
I just did.
You just quoted my challenge?
Where?
Fucking sophist
That’s not a quote
I never said that
"You have yet to prove that implicit consent is necessarily coercive"
Sure did. Wow.
Drunk?
That’s a quote, but beforehand you did not do so
How slow are you?
The impossibility to prove implicit consent does not make it coercive
This is cute, you're both such incredibly toxic human beings, I wouldn't be surprised if you hook up at some point
"You just quoted my challenge?"
Then....."That’s not a quote"
Then......"I never said that"
Hmmmmm.....
Read it very slowly
I will give you one chance here to tabula rasa
Can you opt-out of implied consent?
No, but such does not make it coercive.
You seem to conflate the actions taken *because of* implicit consent with the action itself
Such is incorrect
But that's social contract. You're using the thing so must agree to the rules. That's an assumption and cannot be backed by factual evidence. And since I didnt have to agree to any terms to enter into a server or discord, to enact new or unknown rules after entering is coercive.
It's a public forum.
Social contract is the *outcome*, as are the actions taken under the name of
Not an apartment.