Implicit consent is by it's very nature coercive because it can't be enforced. To claim that it is a contract is the coercion.

Unenforceability is coercion?

Is that your argument?

Because if the one trying to enforce the contract, is using a nullity, the very thought of it being an enforceable contract is coercion.

Is unenforceability grounds to classify a thing as coercive?

Illegitimate enforcement is grounds to classify a thing as coercive.

Agreed, but again, implicit consent is not the enforcement thereof

Will you admit this or not?

Unenforceability means no there is no contract.

Will you admit or not?

To what? That implied consent isn't a contract? Yes. Implied consent also implies enforcement to a statist. (One that uses might makes right)
Implied consent IS enforcement.

That implication is incorrect

I reject it

Please explain.

I reject that implicit consent confers enforcement, and unless you consider yourself a statist by your logic, I presume you agree

Ergo I believe you’ve called your own arguments herein irrelevant

Because you agree that implicit consent is not the enforcement thereof

Ergo implicit consent is not coercive

Why do you reject it?

Because it is incorrect

Explain your claim.

Implicit consent does not necessarily beget enforcement

Consider the case of the man kissing his wife

I'm not talking about men and women. I am talking about discord.

If you’re not talking about whether implicit consent is coercive or not, fuck off

@Anastasia savvy?

I am talking about whether implied consent is coercive in Discord. Or YOU fuck off.
Savvy, mate?

Does the location change whether it is or isn’t coercive?

If not, it’s an irrelevant distinction

Says you.

If so, I reject the posit on the grounds it is the relativists position and is thus untenable

Because I said so isn't a very strong position.

Why is it relevant if the location does not change it?

Burden is upon you to show relevance

Why is such a distinction necessary supposing location is irrelevant?

Relevance of a discussion about discord? Hmmmmm..... I'll guess anything to do with implied consent of a discord server would be relevant.

A location other than discord, would need to be shown to be relevant. So.. .....

It’s relevant because location does not impact whether implicit consent is necessarily coercive

Otherwise is the relativists position

Does it though? I mean, in your kissing example. How do you know there wasn't explicit consent?

There can be