Which brings us to one more reason, alongside disease, sterility and effeminacy, that traditional social norms the world over are necessarily and correctly opposed to open homosexuality: the more homosexuals there are in a society, and the more open they are about their homosexuality, the less warm male heterosexuals can be towards each other, and the weaker the social bonds between male heterosexuals will be, and the weaker the social fabric of the society itself will be, as society is necessarily founded upon the Mannerbund between a society’s male heterosexuals who honor, uphold and propagate the society’s values.

Open homosexuals represent a signalling hazard for male heterosexuals. A male heterosexual who needs to signal appreciation, affection or love of a male heterosexual friend also needs to be sure that his signal will not be interpreted as a sexual advance – either by the intended recipient of the signal or by others. Homosexuals may be interested in signalling homosexuality, but male heterosexuals certainly are not.

The more open homosexuals there are in a society, the less certain a male heterosexual can be that a gesture of masculine camaraderie won’t be interpreted as a sexual advance.

You might laugh at this line of reasoning, but in Azerbaijan they bring each other flowers and kiss each others’ cheeks without a second thought, and I can guarantee how that would be interpreted in the West.

It is not interpreted that way in Azerbaijan, because there are officially no homosexuals. Male heterosexuals are free to do and say what they like without the risk of mis-signalling.

metaphorically i mean

I've wondered why male camraderie was all fucked up in america

@Dong why can girls still touch each other and shit

I mean straight women are very touchy

and it isn't sexual

they're more like children iunno

it's probably because women don't have the same kind of sexual energy

something like that

"The Mannerbund is also the source of sexual morality, which is actually a subset of property rights, since women are naturally the property of men – of either their fathers or husbands. Suppose you have a good friend. Suppose this friend has a girlfriend. Do you hit on your friend’s girlfriend in front of his face? No? Why not? Isn’t she a free individual enjoying all the rights afforded to her by a liberal democratic society, including the right to accept and decline sexual offers with consent? She doesn’t have to accept your advances, but why is it anathema to even make them? The reason is that your friend’s girlfriend is your friend’s property, and if the two of you are friends, you are members of a Mannerbund with (at least) two men. She is “his,” not yours, and hitting on her would be just as bad as reaching for your friend’s wallet."

yeah I've stopped talking to girls out of respect for the dude

girls hate that

They wish it would be respect for them or something idk

lol

I saw someone complaining about it

Women are the same way kind of anyway

they're not gonna flirt with their friend's husband if they're half decent women

women are their husband's property and men are their wive's property to an extent

it's not balanced in any way

What happens if all of the mde discords get purged at once

I doubt this one would get purged

It could be argued that the family (specifically the nuclear family) is a more basic socio-political unit than the Mannerbund, but this approach is incorrect. To paraphrase Mencius Moldbug, hominids need government and politics because hominids are social and violent. To clarify Moldbug, hominids need government and politics because male hominids are social and violent. A man’s woman and children are extensions of the man and dependent on the man’s capacity for violence on their behalf, i.e. on their man’s capacity to defend them physically from other men. Women and children are social but their capacity for violence –- physical, but also psychological — is negligible compared to that of men’s, and for this reason they are de facto property, not political agents themselves. The Mannerbund, not the family, is the basic working socio-political unit.

A solid and dependable Mannerbund is a necessity for every man. No man is an island, they say, and a man without a local Mannerbund is going have deeply limited capacities when it comes to securing his property and legacy. Individualistic proponents of neomasculinity are missing the point already: no man is more “alpha” than a Mannerbund. Without a Mannerbund, a man cannot control his women, he cannot ensure his immobile property’s security in the case of state failure (deliberate or not), and without security of his women or property, he cannot secure the futures of his children.

they're going to purge us for those socks

@Deleted User Someone has to report the Discord or it has to be very high profile

and regarding the latter, that's just if they're going out of their way to target "brands", like they did with "Alt-Right" Discords. It's a public relations thing.

even then, I can't say none of those were reported

I don't think Discord is finding any MDE-themed Discord and deleting in principle, regardless.

When a bunch of MDE Discords in a row were being deleted many months ago, someone kept getting let into every new group that reported them. I forget specifics but it was some butthurt tranny

and Discord was presumably obeying said reports because real talk every MDE Discord is practically /pol/ 2.0

Good afternoon all, hope you're having a blessed day. How are you?

can’t wait till we get our first mega city

I'm pretty pissed they took the only white ethnostate away from us

The Internet

https://8ch.net/pol/res/12141627.html

careful what you say buddy

Jew overlords always listening

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/387317299851558913/489388878348681216/image0.jpg

jesus

that's so hot

hnnnggg

fucking wierdo