Message from @scout_t286
Discord ID: 446567520510410753
He also made an interesting point in that talk; in the Annotated Reference Manual, the document that would later be the basis for the ISO standard, Stroustrup made sure to write down everything twice. So in case he made a mistake writing what he intended, people would catch him. But in standard documents, it's like the goal is to write everything exactly once. So people find something that looks weird, or wrong, they never know if it's intended or not.
There has been cases in the standard of this, where they later had to clarify things with footnotes, examples, sometimes rewrite phrases entirely.
This reminded of the US Constitution, how people were uncertain about how to interpret things like the 2A, right away. "Can we have canons?" "Yes, that's the whole fucking purpose of the 2A, you can have everything the government can."
It's elegant to have a precise but terse document, but the person writing it might not be perfect enough. The "write it twice, in different ways" seems better indeed.
C++ should just be called C-- because it’s just C, but worse
Go back to saying "oof", to reduce the stupidity you spew.
@Deleted User got a problem with objects?
@scout_t286 nope, I just got a problem with cunts
The Java crowd is thataway -points-
Oof
Ever heard of the language c+=?
@scout_t286 yep
funny shit
A loop can be what ever kind of loop it wants to be
lol
I forgot how ridcious that was
We should probably clone that before github shuts it down and bans the user for hate speech.
```cpp
/*
* The concept of 'sorting' things has long been a cornerstone of
* patriarchal discrimination against women and PoC. To 'sort' objects
* according to some percieved 'value' is morally wrong and oppressive.
* Therefore a truly feminist algorithm cannot be based upon comparing
* values of 'objects'. Feminist sorting algorithms have to take various
* things into consideration: gender, race, the program's feelings and
* the current make-up of the objects to be sorted. To implement this,
* we use a progressive stack with added affirmative action.
*/```
Concerning that talk... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vuw_GUvL-sE
meh
wasn't posting it to implore you to go on a stupid fucking journey
was just fun to see shit being thrown back at scammers
Paulie No-nose *is* a bum though
@Legiondude lmao that fucking podcast 😂
What’s so funny about it @Durtle02 ?
You got a problem shithead?
Git gud at js before you start shit talking, durtle
Learn to be a decent human before you go talking, douchebag.
Learn to be a mod, not a fuck boy
Do you have any common decency? All you do is criticize and insult.
>asks what’s so funny about the video
>gets called a shithead
🤔🤔🤔
Yeah, cause I got no respect for you.
>What’s so funny about it @Durtle02 ?
Is the most passive aggressive way you could ask that and if you dont understand how you're coming across online maybe it's time you realize.
Cause either you actually wanted to know or you're trying to be a douche and it really seems as the latter cause that's you're usual behavior.
that huawei don't look so good
why?
4 gb ram