Meh, it's just a toy.

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lrisviel/markdown/master/github/display1.jpg

Look at this shit, the hair got painted blue from the clothes.

Then look at how many "hint points" are needed to get proper coloring: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lrisviel/markdown/master/github/display3.jpg

I don't see this being any better than coloring by hand, if the artist has a proper drawing tablet.

Speed. Proper coloring takes hours. This can be done in 5-10 minutes by someone with much less skill

Seriously, look at the number of points needed with white color.

If I had to fight this much against this "automated" tool, I'd rather paint it by hand.

https://www.sciencealert.com/here-s-what-theoretical-physicists-think-of-the-us-military-s-warp-drive-research?utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fzen.yandex.com

a.k.a massive waste of taxpayers' money.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VjGSMUep6_4

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/01/microsoft--github-acquisition-talks-resume.html

no, no,... no no no.

Bitbucket > Github.

anything not owned by microsoft > anything owned by microsoft

I dunno where this attitude comes from that Microsoft is somehow the big evil. Microsoft are a pretty decent company especially when you are a professional dev

There development tooling is second to none IMHO. They are far better at giving stuff away for nothing unlike Google for example. I been using TFS online for years (along side bitbucket and github) and they are all good.

Github will be continue to be free. Microsoft will sell a "Github" enterprise which will be an onsite github

Microsoft has terrible internal management.

Github is going to go the way of SourceForge.

lol didnt source forge get bought and turned around recently?

https://youtu.be/4ElZec033vQ

SF had all projects once.

But it stuck with an arcane system to upload files, CVS, and was as slow as mollasses in January.

When everyone was moving to hg, git, SF announced support for... SVN.

And then that scandal with the mirror sites injecting malware in the download files happened.

I personally never liked source forge.

And @andy is an edgi boi is right, fuck Microsoft.

I like the test pipeline support of Bitbucket anyway.

Sourceforge was really good back in 2003. The whole "fuck microsoft" is just really cringey when working in the professional world. I am from the UK and a huge number of jobs are .NET based.

Also the bitbucket pipelines stuff has been in TFS since 2013.

@DanielKO The Dev management has always been pretty good. It is Office and Windows that has been historically a mess.

@Deleted User you are not honestly comparing a free to use Bitbucket with a commercial product? Travis-CI combined with Github has them too, but then your code must not be in a private repo. Or there are solutions, which you can deploy for yourself.

Replace "professional" with business, because I never saw .NET in my professional world.

@Deleted User Bitbucket and Atlassian stuff isn't free to use if you got over X number of people in the team you have to pay, the same with Github (mainly private repos etc) and TFS Online.

As for .NET usage it is huge in the UK. I dunno about other countries. I know a lot of web dev shops don't tend to use it and usually stick to node / php. However I don't really want to get into a pissing match about languages because it is completely pointless

Someone asked me to make an emitter of spinning hotdogs

I am aware of that, but this limitation is hardly a problem for most Bitbucket and Github projects.

If you are a bigger company, you should have your own deployd solution anyway.

Why durtle why

@Deleted User well it’s been a problem on some of the projects I’ve worked on. The pricing goes from free to like like £15 then like £1000

@Deleted User in anycase All the major players have had their own ci/cd workflow for quite a while. In anycase it is ridiculous the freak out about github. The company hasn’t had a ceo in months and most comments sections are full of the usual ms hating nonsense