No, why?

"The death of a single Muslim, no matter his role in society, is more grave to the believer than the massacre of every kāfir [disbeliever] on earth. And while the Sharī’ah calls for the invasion of all kāfir lands, certainly the aggressors are dealt with before those nations not actively waging war against the Khilāfah. This is an obvious reality. Any disbeliever standing in the way of the Islamic State will be killed, without pity or remorse, until Muslims suffer no harm and governance is entirely for Allah."

https://azelin.files.wordpress.com/2016/04/the-islamic-state-22dacc84biq-magazine-1422.pdf

It's no joke.

Very professionaly put together.

Makes for some damn good evidence that ISIS is fucked, whenever anyone tries to argue otherwise.

Although I suppose the argument is more often that ISIS is only a small fraction of Muslims, which might be true but misleading.

they refer to westerners as the "crusaders"

Well, this should be used as evidence that you can't negotiate with fanatics

and man that quote is just the beginning, it gets worse

dude some of this is fucking insane, a story about a dream a guy had of detonating himself and his friend being like "yo pick up his head to see if he's smiling"

I remember Sargs used an issue of the mag in one of his videos

Looked pretty schmick

Yup

jihadology

Sounds like a Prince song

is the website to go to to get analysis on ISIS

i wont post the link here

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EuLH0_4X168

listening now

funnily enough

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kWa8w0aCdTE

so this is a interesting concept

the best thought on it is the book starship troopers

highly recommend

service earns citizenship

Earning the right to vote seems fishy to me

its obviously wrong

when the state gets to decide who votes on totally obligatory criteria then it is no longer a democracy

plus the whole concept of representetive democracy goes down the toilet

If you cant vote you arent represented

Well nobody was saying the government would decide who gets to vote.

You're making a straw man, friend.

And franti, we already have certain restrictions on voting.

To say 'if you can't vote you aren't represented' misses the point of the representation. The vote doesn't represent you, politicians do.

At least, that's the hope.

So even if you can vote, that doesn't mean your personal interestes are represented. In fact no one's interests are represented 100% of the time.

To be clear Radeon, the US isn't a democracy. It's a constitutional republic.

Direct democracy is basically mob rule and it's a horrible way to do just about anything.

At least of a bureaucratic nature.