shekelstein

That's because they upped the building codes after that lmfao

yes, fire is pretty hot, it can make things expand fast

An plane exploding in tower is going to create a fire

heavy material falling down is pretty destructive, it can make things collapse pretty fast.

@Durtle02 no the WTC7

plane never hit that one

it being unprecedented does not make it impossible

[7:05 PM] Mal: you think the government could keep something like that secret?
i dont belive anything "its just concpiracy"

and most people dont even have looked in to it.🤔

I looked into it again just now, the investigation that was done makes sense

do you have a better explanation than "it was an inside job", because thermal expansion + progressive collapse is currently in the lead for my support by about a factor of a billion.

I'd like to hear your take on it

so you rather belive that it collapsed because fire that by coincidece happend same time as those planes hit towers 1 and 2. even tought building like that shouldnt even be possible to collapse because of fire.

and burining wasnt even hot, black smoke tells lack of oxygen.

"shouldn't even be possible" a study was done to show it was indeed possible

you're not scoring any points there, I'm afraid

the study proved it was possible to reach the required temperatures by fire from office debris

again, you're not winning any points here

science shows it's possible, I'll stick by the science

https://youtu.be/1l-8PFk8j5I?t=342
just watch your self

don't have the time for that I'm afraid, but I might watch it later

https://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/06-09-11/

I honestly think there was coverup with 9/11. There was a conspiracy.

But it was a terrorist attack

it's just the terrorist attack was done by the wrong kind of muslim (saudi arabia) and so the government conspired to hide that detail, blame someone else for it

but that does not explain WTC7

and also pentagon was never hit by plane.

what do you think happened with wtc7 then

there was loud explosions. and it came down like building destruction.

because if it's terrorist attack by the saudis, then it's easy enough to say they tried to cover up wtc7 and just hide it

also if you look more in to reasons there was shit ton of gold under WTC towers.

that some how disapeared🤔

okay, well if there was gold under it, then who did it?

I can safely say the government wouldn't do it for the gold because de jure they already own that gold

goverment=/=CIA

I never said they did

though by that, are you saying it was the CIA?

yep

How competent do you think the CIA is?

CIA is idependent body of goverment that dont ansver to congress or anyone else and with massive budget.