like, each side is value laden to signal to those upon it

That's fine EmptyE just allow me to make my case.

So then they create that wealth, by their own labor and management of assets as well as the labor of others.

sorry

So when you allow people to create their own wealth, they have to be able to keep what they create via their own labor as well as through freedoms of association and conctractual associations.

To set and negotiate their own prices for their labor and their products.

So people who are better at creating more wealth, which exists naturally, will be able to create more wealth if they are not restricted by inequalities under the law.

More than other free individals who do not as effectively fulfill an array of variables used to create wealth.

Perhaps they did not negotiate as well for the price of their product.

Perhaps they did not acquire comparable goods with which to manufacture resulting in an inferior product regardless of quality of labor.

Is this beginning to sound like a defensible position?

I'm not really sure that what you are saying stands up EmptyE. I mean, all the words I'm using are standard language among the conversations of economics and equality versus equity.

What?

one does not means the other

you are talking about wealth

i'm talking about the rule of law

the 8 values

its labeled equality because the people who end up there like that word

https://imgur.com/a/KIEiAM3

Well, that's me. Wouldn't have considered myself that moderate.

it's says `Neo liberalism`

<:think_woke:378717098681171988>

I'm disgusted at myself too.

I'm pretty conservative next to others here, then again I suppose I don't have anything against drug legalisation and gay marriage.

I don't know what you're saying pornochet >.>

my point is if everyone is treated equally, some people will work harder than others and accumulate more wealth

equality under the law leads to inequality of wealth

I genuinely just had someone tell me to my face that Nazis weren't Socialists

that was

an experience

BUT THEY WEREN'T REEE

SOCIALISTS ARE GOOD GUYS

NAZIS ARE BAD

THEREFORE THEY CAN'T BE SOCIALISTS

THE NATIONAL SOCIALISTS AREN'T SOCIALISTS

Tbh the feds shouldn’t be involved in drugs or gay marriage

Its bad because you not allowed to be patriotic or white.

Here's an interesting twitter thread https://t.co/T4DDD9UWf0

@Legiondude if your still interested in that thread; I'd say its important to note that if you just expand the scope a little we can see that Left Populism also gains traction - Spain, Greece and yeah UK: despite claims otherwise, Corbyn does have working class support even if his activists hate them and seem to do everything they can to get them to leave. Not to really argue for the left side, more to say it seems that 'Populism' accross the spectrum is on the rise because of anti-elite sentiments that hes correctly pointed at.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rCPUoCpOX0E

@Thomas the Sowell Train [USA] I'm a simple man, I see 1791L and upvote