Message from @UKEEP🌷
Discord ID: 460342477438844943
also, of course Shaun King threw himself into it, and /r/Pittsburgh had this gem.
Niggerflix is having issues https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jL5kQPKdVkQ
Sargon has met Gerrard batten
Yeah I wanted to post that pic but it wouldn't let me haha
I wonder what they discussed
Who?
Gerrard, PJW and sargon
And who the fuck is Gerrard?
Gerard* it's one of those names I'm used to being spelt a certain way. Gerard is the leader of UKIP
Is that picture recent?
Yes
I wonder how he feels with Sargonites' plan to take over.
That's all a jokr
Joke
To be able to become a leader of any political party isn't as easy as "I want to become leader"
The NEC wouldn't allow him
They want to change the manifesto.
And to do that you have to become leader and have it approved by the NEC
Well I think the idea is sargon is more popular than UKIP
So if enough of his british followers sign up and UKIP uses any form of democratic system he can easily take over
Sargon isn't as popular as UKIP. He may be more relevant than UKIP currently but in no way a party known internationally and had nearly 4 million votes, over a hundred councillors & the majority of the uk's MEP's less popular than sargon. That's ridiculous and a gross over-exaggeration. And no once again you're wrong. The supporters of his who join UKIP can never form a majority. There's just not enough people who live in the UK, agree with UKIP enough to join and pay the membership fee, go to the election conference and also wait for over a year (requirement to vote for leader at the leadership election). UKIP has a very loyal and different majority than that of sargons and wouldn't vote for him. Furthermore, as I've stated many times now, to stand you need to have multiple requirements and also the very likely possibility is the NEC won't allow him to stand as it's up to them who they accept to stand for leadership.
UKIP has 10k members
Yes
Actually
We have 21k
But carry on
Sargon has 809k youtube subscribers
Yes. Your point?
Which number is bigger?
Sargon obviously.
So he's....
He's got 809k subscribers
What are you trying to say
If your trying to say that all because he has more subscribers than UKIP has members so that means that hes more popular you are dumber than I thought. Political party membership does not represent their popularity. If it did then millions of people would be a member of UKIP, conservatives, Labour, lib dems etc. That is just not true. Popularity comes in votes. As evident from past election UKIP total number of votes has greatly surpassed sargons subscriber count.
Membership is more for the loyal supporters of that political party. Those who wish to stand as candidates, help out with events, help elected officials for that party, attend events, have a say in that party etc.
I'm sorry, what was that last example
I didn't catch it
Last example for what?