@Deleted User
There are differences between micro and macro.

Socialism can work in a small village? Yeah, on a whole country? No

it worked in libya

@Deleted User you should go back

i explained above

i will go back

i like when capitalists say "WELL WHY DON'T YOU MOVE THERE?"

i cant fag

And fall off a mountain while you’re at it @Deleted User

Maybe because ghadaffi wasn't exactly a peaceful person?

I think there was this one copse of villages in far rural china that mastered communism or something

Muh condishuons

how was gaddafi not peaceful

they had no electricity, or government, or any of the necessities of modern society

communism and capitalism are both garbage

we need gaddafism more than anything

nationalism + socialism

beyond the left/right spectrum

So naziism?

not exactly

Middle Eastern Nazism

`s e v e r a l p e o p l e a r e t y p i n g`

nazism is a social philosophy, not an economic one

hitler's germany wasnt a democracy

That’s just Baathism

>nazism is just a social philosophy

also dont try to tell me gaddafi suppressed free speech

<:high_iq:382980759012638731>

and fascism was more government, than economic, if I recall

all libyans were allowed to participate in the genereal's congresses

and at many times

gaddafi was criticized

and it was allowed

gaddafi even proposed to get rid of the death penalty

but the libyans voted against it

at one time he proposed to get rid of the central government entirely

and give all oil profits to libyan families

......... this is sounding like my country's media has been lying to me again

Are you actually Libyan?

in fact this is sounding a lot like Syria and Assad

>yes im actually libyan even though my username clearly says another nationality