Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 462175373308985365
plus the people who produced such things were still profiitng
since they were subsidized by the government
the government was effectively buying those things for the people
@Fulcrum010
"speculation" gosh.
"Speaks volumes" for fascists ONLY
@derhorus_
What?
Yeah, your study has a bias, something that's not exactly trustworthy
@Deleted User @Deleted User right now we speaking about these graphs "foreign suspect rates in germany" https://twitter.com/i/moments/1007905017066676224
and specifically about this graph "suspect rates of foreigners by 100.000 people in a classification by country of origin"! https://twitter.com/derhorus_x/status/1007909951371608064
it doesnt matter
just stop accepting
refugees
and send them back
to their countries
or at least send them to more familiar countries
which are safe
like saudi arabia
and iran
@Deleted User only 0,5% of these migrants are "refugees" by national and international law
in germany
send the economic migrants back too
but this is what gaddafi said would happen
big ass paragraph coming up
lol
@Fulcrum010 ... bring something content-related forward. like divergent (criminological) studies. especially the about research effects of classifications by country of origin and by panel data. i will not do a lecture in the basics of social science research, because you personally do not trust or think there is bias, especially i am not able to prove to you "the world" ad infinitum and prove your premisses. falsification not claiming!
if you critize bring on your own proven counterarguments, else you only purpose in the discussion is to destroy the discussion, because you do not like the results. actually it proving that you are an ideologist...
I haven't even seen your study
I'm waiting for the English version
Plus, it's not my fault you wanted to use made up data on your study
thats cowardly, waiting for the "english" haha. but talking shit as hell, well done...
prove that its made up LOLOLOLOLOLOL
It's not cowardice, i noticed a flaw, talked about it, now I'm waiting to see the whole thing to better judge it
Like, I'm just talking about the IQ thing, not the rest, because i haven't seen the rest
falsification not claiming!
I'm basing my opinion onw your own words, when you admitted that the IQ thing was based on their home IQ, not by a study made by the German government
A projection or speculation, as i said before
subtitle "country of orgin"!
iq by lynn and vahanen, noted and quoted clearly
This will keep going and going
Anyway, i said what i think about it
-Biased
-Made up data
Now i wait to see the rest of it
prove it
Prove what? That german didn't pooled their IQ?
You said it yourself