i assume that drop

is because of the 2008 thing

and as it recovered

rebels started rebelling

and y'know

also i doubt libya lied about being rich

or else they couldnt afford the shit they had

@Deleted User in general for gdp i used the worldbank data, for libya 2016 conclusive with all known reports - of a war torn country - i set it in the bracket below $4999

they wouldnt be able to afford to subsidize human rights

as i said

you cant believe housing, food, water, etc are human rights

if you charge for them

plus the people who produced such things were still profiitng

since they were subsidized by the government

the government was effectively buying those things for the people

@Fulcrum010
"speculation" gosh.
"Speaks volumes" for fascists ONLY

@derhorus_
What?

Yeah, your study has a bias, something that's not exactly trustworthy

@Deleted User @Deleted User right now we speaking about these graphs "foreign suspect rates in germany" https://twitter.com/i/moments/1007905017066676224

and specifically about this graph "suspect rates of foreigners by 100.000 people in a classification by country of origin"! https://twitter.com/derhorus_x/status/1007909951371608064

it doesnt matter

just stop accepting

refugees

and send them back

to their countries

or at least send them to more familiar countries

which are safe

like saudi arabia

and iran

@Deleted User only 0,5% of these migrants are "refugees" by national and international law

in germany

send the economic migrants back too

but this is what gaddafi said would happen

nobody listened

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/7973649/Gaddafi-Europe-will-turn-black-unless-EU-pays-Libya-4bn-a-year.html

big ass paragraph coming up

lol

@Fulcrum010 ... bring something content-related forward. like divergent (criminological) studies. especially the about research effects of classifications by country of origin and by panel data. i will not do a lecture in the basics of social science research, because you personally do not trust or think there is bias, especially i am not able to prove to you "the world" ad infinitum and prove your premisses. falsification not claiming!

if you critize bring on your own proven counterarguments, else you only purpose in the discussion is to destroy the discussion, because you do not like the results. actually it proving that you are an ideologist...

I haven't even seen your study

I'm waiting for the English version

Plus, it's not my fault you wanted to use made up data on your study

thats cowardly, waiting for the "english" haha. but talking shit as hell, well done...

prove that its made up LOLOLOLOLOLOL