Message from @What Would Jack Conte Do?
Discord ID: 471113633816903692
however, BC increased the foreign buyer's tax
they'll keep increasing it until people stop complaining i imagine
the days of the leaf are numbered
foreign buyer's tax!
its keeping us alive a little longer
hehe
Do the Aussie states have something like that in place, China's sinking their tentacles into their real estate markets there as well
i dunno
they can just flee to the kangaroo savannahs
or wherever
canada's too cold though, we have grizzlies
if you've seen the movie the Revenant
that's like rural canada, every day
they still use muskets up here
pretty bad ass
I haven't, but enough modern westerns are filmed up in BC anyway...
heh
Muskets? Wow
anyway, gotta go
Fucking Chinamen, buying up good real-estate.
i did an edgy
Chink lover
oh sooo edgy
make me so horny
What is your opinion on a policy that would limit a person to one child if that person if that person accepted welfare?
Can you expand?
If you are currently receiving welfare from the state you are not allowed to have more than one child. It is essentially China's one child policy but only applied to those who receive state welfare
Others here may have a problem with it, but I don't see how this violates any principles. You're making a contract with the state, and having a child breaks that contract.
The question is, how do you enforce that, and is it possible to be enforced? Are the people on welfare, who are now even more poor because of having a second child, going to pay a fine? Jail time? What?
They could be take off welfare if they have a second child or continue on welfare if they get there tubes tied or a vasectomy
Good luck getting anything like that agreed upon by a majority of people
Lmao. If it were to be passed, I feel like it would be the best way to shift the population to traits that capitalism deems is best
You won't even make it past twitter
According to the washpo [first thing that comes up on google] only 21.3% of people are on welfare. I think if people didn't instantly infer this to be an attack on POC it would stand a chance. Even though arguing against this policy based on racism is basically saying POC's have no agency. I think anyone who advocates this policy would be instantly deemed a racist.
What would be the argument against this policy other than you are racist?
"I'm a good person, but the feel good policies are the ones that are bad for civilization!"
don't you fucking love humanity
I mean, if you want to be on welfare, chances are you don't want kids
but both sides are like NO I KNOW WHATS BEST FOR PEOPLE
^
and they talk while food falls out of their fucking mouths