> Red leaf

Right

Forgot that one

john LENIN

was from britain... so the point i make is meaningless in this conversation

still tho

yeah, china is buying up west coast property

however, BC increased the foreign buyer's tax

they'll keep increasing it until people stop complaining i imagine

the days of the leaf are numbered

foreign buyer's tax!

its keeping us alive a little longer

hehe

Do the Aussie states have something like that in place, China's sinking their tentacles into their real estate markets there as well

i dunno

they can just flee to the kangaroo savannahs

or wherever

canada's too cold though, we have grizzlies

if you've seen the movie the Revenant

that's like rural canada, every day

they still use muskets up here

pretty bad ass

I haven't, but enough modern westerns are filmed up in BC anyway...

heh

Muskets? Wow

anyway, gotta go

Fucking Chinamen, buying up good real-estate.

damn chinks

i did an edgy

Chink lover

oh sooo edgy

make me so horny

What is your opinion on a policy that would limit a person to one child if that person if that person accepted welfare?

Can you expand?

If you are currently receiving welfare from the state you are not allowed to have more than one child. It is essentially China's one child policy but only applied to those who receive state welfare

Others here may have a problem with it, but I don't see how this violates any principles. You're making a contract with the state, and having a child breaks that contract.

The question is, how do you enforce that, and is it possible to be enforced? Are the people on welfare, who are now even more poor because of having a second child, going to pay a fine? Jail time? What?

They could be take off welfare if they have a second child or continue on welfare if they get there tubes tied or a vasectomy

Good luck getting anything like that agreed upon by a majority of people

Lmao. If it were to be passed, I feel like it would be the best way to shift the population to traits that capitalism deems is best

You won't even make it past twitter

According to the washpo [first thing that comes up on google] only 21.3% of people are on welfare. I think if people didn't instantly infer this to be an attack on POC it would stand a chance. Even though arguing against this policy based on racism is basically saying POC's have no agency. I think anyone who advocates this policy would be instantly deemed a racist.

What would be the argument against this policy other than you are racist?