The stereotypes exist as a deterrent to black culture

most pro-latino ppl

when told of the racism between the two

they look confused

ty intersectionism

But they're both *brown!!*

no

it doesnt matter since most ppl who claim, to fight for minorites

dont know what is what

The guy from Nevada actually did time for being a pimp at 1 point. talk about an L for political correctness. Also, none of these seats are confirmed into November. however, its mostly a shoe for all candidates since everything a so partisan. America needs a centrist 3rd party

actually u dont need 3rd party

u just need to vote for the candidate u want

instead of voting for the ones more likely to win

honestly the one thing i hate most about voters is that they are so uninformed about other candidates

they are either lazy or 'too busy' to look up the profiles of the candidates

Or people who just vote the party line

Capitalism, so easy a dog can do it

Awwwww!! Payment pupper!

Sent it to my mom this was her response

Sadly some people are dumber than this dog and will just wait at the counter without even trying

doesnt the dog die from chocolate in the cookies

Not all cookies have chocolate

https://twitter.com/ChuckCallesto/status/1022725083524161536

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zKtOjzCkzQM

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/07/25/man-no-penis-admits-sexually-assaulting-two-women-thought-having/

https://twitter.com/ThomasSowell/status/1022527721480568832

Boom

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/facebook-stock-crushed-after-revenue-user-growth-miss-2018-07-25

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-XURJ15S9xEk/T6QGIlwtlrI/AAAAAAAABGE/LZER-vUpq8c/s1600/survivor-smile.gif

Tim Pool had a good piece on the FB stuff.

TL;DR - It's not because of scandals, it's because they missed their growth target.

yea and did news today that facebook are having negative user grow per month is not helping either

Not negative, just slower

They still are gaining more than they are losing.

But most tech stocks are fallacys since rarly is there profit. Their stocks are based on *growth* unlike other stocks

Going to bed in a moment, but I wanted to ask, how controversial is thinking money is free speech lol

Just finished writing an argument for it, so rip lol.

I'm not sure I understand your statement

@Ipod Inversely, how controversial is having a campaign donation limit for candidates?

Maybe... $100/person and $1000/business

https://youtu.be/S0hNyrhaP0Q?t=9m20s

Talks for 10 minutes, is told he's wrong by someone that lived in the USSR for 30 years, decides "this is a waste of my time' all of a sudden.

@Fitzydog I would say that there should be no limits.

@Drunklama It was late at night when I wrote my statement, but what I meant was money is free speech and therefore shouldn't be taken out of politics. And to explain further I have three arguments, 2 more fundamental, and one pragmatic, in order to support my position.

1: So long as government has the ability to regulate and control the market, businesses will try and get a hold of politicians and political power in order to control the market themselves. So the issue is not money in politics, but rather that the government has the ability to control markets. Take away that ability and businesses have no real reason to influence politics besides what the individuals that own those businesses are interested in. Since governments do have the ability, however, we find that businesses are forced to play politics so that their competitors do not get the power to control the market, and instead, they get the power to control the market.